Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.
Full description
This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the RCT DUPLICATE initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to emulate, as closely as is possible in healthcare insurance claims data, the trial listed below/above. Although many features of the trial cannot be directly emulated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the trial. Randomization is also not emulable in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice. Investigators assume that the RCT provides the reference standard treatment effect estimate and that failure to replicate RCT findings is indicative of the inadequacy of the healthcare claims data for emulation for a range of possible reasons and does not provide information on the validity of the original RCT finding.
The SOUL trial, which is a superiority trial to evaluate the effect of oral semaglutide versus placebo on MACE outcomes (CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD).
The database study designed to emulate SOUL will be a new-user active comparative study, where we compare the effect of oral semaglutide versus sitagliptin on MACE outcome among patients with T2DM and with established ASCVD and/or CKD. Sitagliptin was selected to act as an active-comparator proxy for placebo.
Sitagliptin and the class of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have been demonstrated not to have an effect on MACE in a series of RCTs, and they are used in similar stages of disease/line of therapy as semaglutide, as well as being similarly costly.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Eligible cohort entry dates:
Market availability of oral semaglutide in the US began on 19th September 2019.
Optum: Study period between 20th Sept 2019 - 29th February 2024 Marketscan: Study period between 20th Sept 2019 - 31st Dec 2022 Medicare: Study period between 20th Sept 2019 - 31st Dec 2020
Inclusion Criteria:
At least one of the following conditions:
Coronary heart disease defined by at least one of the following criteria:
i. Prior myocardial infarction ii. Prior coronary revascularization procedure ii. 50% or above stenosis in coronary artery documented by cardiac catheterization, computerized tomography coronary angiography iv. Coronary heart disease with ischemia documented by stress test with any imaging modality
Cerebrovascular disease defined by at least one of the following criteria:
i. Prior stroke ii. Prior carotid artery revascularization procedure iii. 50% or above stenosis in carotid artery documented by x-ray angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, computerized tomography angiography or Doppler ultrasound
Symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) defined by at least one of the following criteria:
i. Intermittent claudication with an Ankle-brachial index (ABI) below 0.85 at rest ii. Intermittent claudication with a 50% or above stenosis in peripheral artery (excluding carotid) documented by x-ray angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, computerized tomography angiography or Doppler ultrasound iii. Prior peripheral artery(excluding carotid) revascularization procedure iv. Lower extremity amputation at or above ankle due to atherosclerotic disease (excluding trauma or osteomyelitis)
Chronic kidney disease defined as: i. eGFR below 60mL/min/1.73 m^2 (based on medical records using latest available and no more than 6 months old assessment)
Exclusion Criteria:
43,650 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal