ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Maxillary Prognathism

Treatments

Device: KILBON Appliance
Device: CAT appliance

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06366737
CEBD-CU-2024-03-02

Details and patient eligibility

About

en-mass retraction by lingual retractor versus clear alighner therapy

Full description

Comparative Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion Treated By Upper First Premolars Extraction And Enmass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment Using Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrews :A Randomized Clinical Trial

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with mild crowding

Exclusion criteria

    • adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with moderate to severe crowding

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

30 participants in 2 patient groups

KILBON appliance
Active Comparator group
Description:
en-mass retraction by lingual retractor
Treatment:
Device: KILBON Appliance
CAT appliance
Active Comparator group
Description:
en-mass retraction by clear aligner
Treatment:
Device: CAT appliance

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems