Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The laying of a naso-gastric tube is an extremely common event in intensive medicine; although standard naso-gastric tube laying is performed at the patient's bedside, this procedure is not without risk. Through the use of methods already used in the clinical field, of daily use, we want to identify the threshold value between tracheal and esophageal etCO2 (group A) and the threshold value between gastric and esophageal pH (group B).
Full description
Numerous methodologies have been evaluated to recognize the correct positioning of NGT at the gastric level, including different clinical techniques (such as gastric auscultation, aspiration of the NGT), ultrasound techniques, etc. Actually, the diagnostic gold standard is the thoraco-abdominal anterior-posterior radiography, which is considered the only non-invasive method capable to confirm the correct pose of the NGT at intra-diaphragmatic level. This method, however, even if it is non-invasive, requires the use of ionizing radiation (4 micro-Sievert (uSv) for radiography) which could be repeated multiple time for the same patient; NGT may need to be repositioned several times during the same hospital stay, increasing patient exposure to ionizing radiation and, potentially, also the health workers exposure.
The aim is to identify into the group A the threshold value between tracheal and esophageal etCO2 and into the group B the theshold value between gastric and esophageal pH.
Phase A: etCO2 measurement will be collected 1. after intubation, when the tube is inserted into the endotracheal tube, before proceeding with the aspiration of secretions and 2. once the NGT has been inserted, by a probe located at the end of the tube.
Phase B: pH measurement will be collected at the end of the procedure, once the NGT is inserted, at 1.a distance of 25 cm from the mouth (oesophageal site) and at 2. a distance of 40 cm (gastric site), aspirating the gastric contents and measuring on specific litmus paper.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
85 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal