Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
A randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) versus a control sham intervention (diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without pyloric disruption) in patients with medically refractory gastroparesis.
Full description
A comparative effectiveness, single center (with two surgical units), randomized (1:1) study of endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) versus a control sham intervention (diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without pyloric disruption) in adult patients with medically refractory gastroparesis who have failed management with dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological therapy for at least six months.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Karim Kheniser
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal