Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique

Mansoura University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Pilonidal Sinus

Treatments: Procedure: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04418336

R.19.04.495.R1 - 2019/05/12

Details and patient eligibility

About

Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.

Enrollment: 60 estimated patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .

Exclusion criteria

• Abscess formation
• Immunodeficiency.
• Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
• Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

60 participants in 3 patient groups

Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT)

Active Comparator group

Description:

Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT)

Treatment:

Procedure: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique

Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC)

Active Comparator group

Description:

Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC)

Treatment:

Procedure: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique

lay open technique

Active Comparator group

Description:

lay open technique

Treatment:

Procedure: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique