Endoscopic Quality Improvement System Study

Wuhan University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Gastric Precancerous Condition; Adenoma Colon

Treatments: Behavioral: Quality audit and feedback; Behavioral: Control

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04654247

EA-19-004

Details and patient eligibility

About

We intend to develop intelligent quality control and management software based on the work of digestive endoscopic artificial intelligence in the Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, to accurately and comprehensively assess the quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy and to provide a practical basis for improving the quality of digestive endoscopy in our endoscopic center.

Enrollment: 17 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Endoscopist:

1. Endoscopist with more than one year experience in gastrointestinal mirror operation;
2. Willing to further improve endoscopic quality through Endo.Adm feedback;
3. Ability to read, understand and sign informed consent; The investigator believes that the subject understands the flow of the clinical study and is willing and able to complete all research procedures and follow-up visits in conjunction with the research process.

Exclusion criteria

Endoscopist:

1. Have participated in other clinical trials;
2. Frequently attending in academic conference which is difficult to ensure the number of endoscopic operations;
3. Endoscopist who were either not present for both parts (phase1 and phase2) of the study.

Patients:

Colonoscopy:

1. Polyposis syndromes
2. Lumen obstruction
3. History of colorectal surgery
4. History of colorectal surgery

Gastroscopy:

1. Obstruction
2. History of gastric surgery

Trial design

Primary purpose: Health Services Research

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

17 participants in 2 patient groups

Control group

Sham Comparator group

Description:

Endoscopists in control group were informed standard quality indicators requirements and the corresponding references during informed consent.

Treatment:

Behavioral: Control

Feedback group

Experimental group

Description:

Endoscopists in feedback group were informed standard quality indicators requirements and the corresponding references during informed consent. In addition to the quality requirements, endoscopists randomized to feedback group received customized quality reports feedback from Endo.Adm weekly.

Treatment:

Behavioral: Quality audit and feedback