ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation in the Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus (RATE)

C

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education

Status

Completed

Conditions

Reflux Disease
Barrett Esophagus
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Treatments

Procedure: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation
Procedure: Endoscopic hybrid argon plasma coagulation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study compares patients' acceptability and safety of two established endoscopic methods for treating dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: radiofrequency ablation versus hybrid argon plasma coagulation.

Full description

Both endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are established treatment modalities for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Recently, a modification of the APC method has emerged, which involves a submucosal injection of saline preceding the thermal ablation (hybrid-APC; h-APC). This allows to increase the procedure's safety and presumably reduces the patients' post-procedural discomfort. Although both RFA and h-APC are characterized by high effectiveness in eradicating Barrett's segments, limited data compares the patient-related aspects of the procedures. To fill this knowledge gap, we set out a single-center randomized-controlled trial to compare procedural acceptability, safety, and impact on the quality of life, of the two methods.

Enrollment

62 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects over 18 years
  • Histologically and endoscopically proven Barrett's esophagus requiring ablation therapy according to the current guidelines
  • General health status sufficient to perform an endoscopic procedure (ASA I-III)

Exclusion criteria

  • Primary or secondary coagulopathy, with INR>1.5 and/or platelet count of <75,000.
  • Anticoagulation therapy (e.g. warfarin) for high-risk condition and unable to withhold the medication temporarily
  • Recent myocardial infraction or other significant cardiovascular event within 6 months prior to recruitment
  • Patients under long-term care and/or within nursing facilities (e.g. psychosocial disorders, mental retardation)
  • Any history of esophageal resection surgery
  • Esophageal varices

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

62 participants in 2 patient groups

radiofrequency ablation
Active Comparator group
Description:
Circumferential ablation with radiofrequency ablation will be performed for each segment of the BE starting from the proximal end with one ablation at 12J/cm2, followed by cleaning of mucosal slough with esophageal cap, patient extubation, cleaning of ablation device with wet gauze, and finally a second ablation at 12 J/cm2 (1 × 12J/cm2-clean-1 × 12 J/cm2). Focal ablations will be performed with three consecutive ablations at 12 J/cm2 without cleaning (simplified protocol).
Treatment:
Procedure: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation
hybrid argon plasma coagulation
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in the Hybrid argon plasma coagulation group will be treated with a single ablation per session with a power limitation of 60 W (pulsed mode (VIO® 300 D \& APC 2, PULSED APC®, Effect 2). No scraping with the endoscope cap and second ablation will be performed.
Treatment:
Procedure: Endoscopic hybrid argon plasma coagulation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Jaroslaw Regula, MD, PhD; Wladyslaw Jannuszewicz, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems