Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this single-center, two-arm, open-labeled, randomized controlled clinical study is to compare two surgical interventions, endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt, in treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in terms of clinical improvement.
Full description
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) primarily affects elderly individuals, with prevalence rates of approximately 1.4% among those over 65 years and 5.9% among those over 80 years old. It is characterized by fluid buildup in the brain with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure and is unique among neurodegenerative disorders in its potential for successful treatment. Common symptoms include difficulty walking, urinary incontinence, and cognitive decline, which significantly impact quality of life.
The standard treatment involves inserting a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) to drain cerebrospinal fluid, achieving a 75% success rate in improving symptoms. However, VPS has a drawback: a high rate of revision surgery (approximately 18% during follow-up). An alternative treatment is endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), which avoids placing foreign materials and thus eliminates risks associated with shunt malfunction and infections. ETV is an established neuroendoscopic procedure mainly used to treat non-communicating hydrocephalus, typically due to aqueduct stenosis.
This study aims to compare ETV and VPS for the treatment of iNPH to investigate whether ETV leads to fewer complications while achieving a comparable rate of postoperative symptom improvement.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Florian Marc Ebel, Dr. med.; Raphael Guzman, Prof. Dr. med.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal