ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Endoscopic Treatment of Complex Anal Fistulas (VAAFT)

University of Southern Denmark (SDU) logo

University of Southern Denmark (SDU)

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Anal Fistula

Treatments

Procedure: operation
Device: VAAFT

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02585167
S-20150053

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the outcome of treatment of complex perianal fistula by Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) compared to fistulectomy and sphincter reconstruction as standard surgical procedure.

Full description

The surgical treatment of complex fistulas is difficult and ideally aims to completely heal the fistula and prevent recurrence without affecting the anal sphincter function. The definitive surgical treatment options include transsphincteric fistulectomy and sphincter repair, intersphincteric ligation of the fistula tract (LIFT), transanal advancement flap and cutting Seton suture. All the methods caries a relative high recurrence and complication rate including the risk of anal incontinence .Transsphincteric fistulectomy and primary reconstruction of the anal sphincter has been reported to have a healing rate between 90 - 95,8 %, recurrence rate of 7,1-9,7 % and 5-30 % experience incontinence in varying degree. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel sphincter saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas and recently introduced with promising early results with a healing rate of 74-87.1 % after 1 year. The procedure can be done as a day-case surgery with the ability of precise identification of the fistula tract, including the presence of secondary branches. The method includes an endoscopic debridement and closure of the internal opening. Only few scientific reports of the method has been published and only with short term results, and there is a need of validating the efficacy of this procedure in a prospective randomized trial. There are few randomised controlled trials in the literature on the treatment of complex anal fistulas treatment and there is no conclusive evidence of which method is the best. Furthermore the knowledge of changes in quality of life and functional results in terms of standardized continence evaluation and manometric studies are either contradictive or simply lacking after the surgery for anal fistulas. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial to compare VAAFT (mini invasive and sphincter-saving) with the traditional transsphincteric fistulectomy and primary reconstruction in terms of recurrence rate, manometric and functional changes as well as changes in quality of life.

Enrollment

47 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with complex transsphincteric anal fistulas >18 yrs old.

Exclusion criteria

  • Crohns fistulas
  • Signs of suppuration or/and branching.
  • Malignancy within 5 yrs.
  • Previous radiotherapy of the abdomen and pelvis.
  • Current Immune- suppressive treatment.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

47 participants in 2 patient groups

Operation
Active Comparator group
Description:
the fistula will be excised after dividing the sphincter and primary reconstruction .
Treatment:
Procedure: operation
VAAFT
Experimental group
Description:
the fistula tract will be visualized by scope, closing the internal opening with absorbable sutures.
Treatment:
Device: VAAFT

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems