Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
In this project the investigators propose to carry out a clinical trial that compares non-endoscopic treatment of cholecystitis with antibiotics versus endoscopic drainage in non-operable acute cholecystitism (AC), especially focused on the rate of subsequent EBP and recurrence of AC, as well as the impact on the quality of life, also exploring the costs.
The ultimate goal of this project is to generate knowledge and scientific evidence that makes it easier for health professionals to choose the most appropriate strategy for non-operable patients with lithiasic AC.
Ourworking hypothesis is that endoscopic treatment (EUS-GBD) will significantly reduce the number of EBP compared to non-endoscopic treatment in patients with non-operable lithiasic AC.
Full description
Design
Patients will be randomized in non-endoscopic group or in endoscopic drainage group.
Antibiotic treatment will start from the moment of diagnosis in both arms of the study. Following the recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Acute Cholecystitis of Tokyo 2018.
The duration of antibiotic treatment in undrained patients will be 10 to 14 days as long as the cholecystitis has been cured and it will be 4-7 days after gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD or PC) as long as the cure has been achieved of cholecystitis.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD)will be performed only in the endoscopic treatment arm. The procedure will be performed after at least 6 hours of fasting
Until the acute cholecystitis is cured, a daily evaluation of the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), temperature measurement and periodic blood tests will be carried out.
All patients will receive regular analgesia. Acute cholecystitis will be considered cured if the patient remains afebrile (<37.5ºC), with controlled abdominal pain and presents normalization or a decrease in the number of leukocytes > 20%.
Antibiotic treatment will be adjusted based on the results of blood cultures (BC) or bile culture if available.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) need. Those patients included who present sepsis, or a critical clinical situation that do not respond to conservative treatment or that after 72 hours of antibiotic treatment do not present clinical improvement, gallbladder drainage will be considered.
Patients included in the NE group who present these circumstances will undergo a PC. For patients in the EUS-GB group, an attempt will be made to perform EUS-GB drainage as soon as possible, and if this is not possible, drainage will be performed by PC (whose performance does not preclude subsequent EUS-GBD).
Periodic follow-up visits will be carried out: every month and every six months until the end of the follow-up. The visits will preferably be face-to-face, and when this is not possible, they will be carried out by telephone, especially in institutionalized patients or with serious mobility problems.
During these visits,
The follow-up variables after discharge will be collected during the scheduled visits or through a telephone interview at the first, sixth and twelfth month of follow-up.
The economic variables and costs will be those offered by the economic management units of each center.
Descriptive analysis. For quantitative variables, the arithmetic mean and standard deviation will be calculated (variables that do not follow a normal distribution will be described as median, minimum, maximum, and interquartile range), and categorical variables will be expressed as percentages and their 95% confidence intervals.
An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed regardless of treatment received after randomization.
A per-protocol analysis will also be performed, including only those subjects in each group in whom the assigned treatment is successfully carried out.
Logistic regression techniques will be performed to evaluate possible confounding factors (admission diagnosis, referral center, admission severity, age, sex, follow-up center).
Given that there may be differences in the time to recurrence in both groups, we will also assess the appearance of recurrences using Cox risk regression models.
Patients will be censored at the time of loss to follow-up or death. Any urgent admission for biliary complications will be considered as an EBP.
The study data will initially be dissociated from the identity of the participant, by means of an ID, by the responsible physician. The relationship between the ID and the identity of the participant will be kept by the research doctors in a file protected with a personal password.
The data will be entered into the database anonymously with the participant's ID, to maintain their anonymity. The database will be password protected and only accessible by researchers.
Patients eligible for our study will undergo an informative interview with a member of the research team, in which the objectives of the study will be explained, permission will be requested for their inclusion in the study, and informed consent will be given for their inclusion. With the acceptance by the patient and the signing of the informed consent.
The benefit for patients that we are looking for with this study is to significantly reduce the risk of readmission due to EBP in patients with acute lithiasic cholecystitis who are not candidates for surgical treatment.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jesús JU Urmán, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal