Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The investigators will evaluate the endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy versus conventional direct laryngoscopy on intubation success, quantified by the number of intubation attempts. The question is important because video laryngoscopes are more expensive than conventional direct laryngoscopes. The additional cost might be justified if video systems improve intubation success and reduce airway trauma. But if they do not, the extra cost would not be justified
Full description
The investigators propose to enroll participants scheduled for elective or emergent cardiac, thoracic, or vascular surgery in the designated operating room suite who require endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia.
A cluster randomized multiple crossover design is used for this trial. The cardiac surgical suites will be divided into 2 sets of 11 operating rooms. Each set is treated as a unit and randomized to receive video or direct laryngoscopy in 1-week blocks, always with 1 set randomized to each approach. For analysis, each operating room within a set will be considered a separate cluster. Randomization will be conducted weekly on a 1:1 unstratified basis, using computer-generated codes maintained in a web-based system. Investigators access these codes a day before each new treatment block begins.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
7,736 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Roberta Johnson
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal