Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this double blind, outcome-assessor blind, randomized controlled trial, is to compare the effectiveness of external encounter counterpulsation (EECP) versus sham procedure in participants with long COVID-19 fatigue.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
Full description
Participants of this trial will be patients recovering from acute COVID-19, 3-12 months following the acute infection, and suffering from fatigue with a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS)-Fatigue short-form (SF)-7a score of > 50.
Exclusion criteria will include contra-indications for EECP (see protocl). Intervention, comparisn and outcomes are described above. Study plan: participants will be invited using social media, after filling a fatigue score (PROMIS) to test for eligibility. Those with a score of > 50 will be invited for a study visit.
Study visit 1 will include informed consent, followed by physician interview, physical examination, ECG; and will be referred for completion of blood tests including complete blood count (CBC) to rule out significant anemia (Hb< 12 for men or hb <10 for women) and serum beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (bHCG).
Eligible patients will then be randomized into two groups for treatment with EECP vs sham procedure. In study Visit 2 they will answer several questionnaires, perforn EndoPAT test to assess endothelial dysfunction, and six-minute walk test, followed by either:
Questionnaire that will be used before and after the intervention will include:
Study Visit 3 (3 months following starting treatment) will be a final Interview to assess improvement by questionnaires, as well as time to return to activity and time to return to work.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
32 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Dana Yelin, MD; Dafna Yahav, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal