ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Enhanced Housing Photoscreeners 2WIN and GoCheckKids Compared in Burma and Alaska

A

Alaska Blind Child Discovery

Status

Completed

Conditions

Amblyopia
Anisometropia

Treatments

Device: photoscreen

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04068129
ABCD GCK Kaleidos

Details and patient eligibility

About

"Adaptica" (Padova, Italy) designed a fixed-distance, dark portable tube with power and remote control for the "2WIN: photoscreener. GoChecksKids designed a flash-concentrating case for the iPhone 7+ to more quickly achieve two-axis photoscreen. These devices were compared to confirmatory exams in children and young adults in a remote Burma clinic and in an Alaskan pediatric ophthalmology practice.

Full description

Photoscreening with follow up confirmatory exams for referred and passed interpretations were offered to children and young adults at a remote clinic in the Karen State of eastern Burma (Myanmar). The clinic had intermittent 220 Volt power generator, but no internet or cell phone coverage.

Consecutive patients in a "WiFi-equipped" pediatric ophthalmology practice in Anchorage, Alaska had photoscreening before confirmatory examination.

Each patient had photoscreening with the "2WIN" photoscreener installed in the "Kaleidos" housing. In Anchorage, the devise was controled by the wireless tablet computer. In Burma, however, despite a "WiFi router" not connected to internet, the tablet computer would not connect to the 2WIN and therefore the "Kaleidos" read-trap door was opened so the 2WIN could be activated and controlled manually. The" 2WIN" stored results on an "micro-SD" memory card which was eventually downloaded to computer.

Each patient also had photoscreening with GoCheckKids (GCK) on an "iPhone 7 Plus" using the enhanced, flash-concentrating cell-phone case. In Anchorage, in addition to on-site smart-phone interpretation, images were uploaded to the central reading center for secondary interpretation. In Burma, all images were retained on the smart phone and eventually uploaded for GoCheckKids central secondary analysis after return to urban internet availability. In Burma, a portable, light-wieght tent was used to provide a dim screening environment with less distraction.

Confirmatory exams were performed consistent with 2003 and 2013 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) uniform guidelines. Cycloplegic refractions were performed 20-40 minutes after cyclopentolate 1% instillation. Visual acuity was checked with patched, surround "HOTV" at 3 meters threshold with at least 3 of 4 optotypes correct. Validation was performed with conventional 2 x 2 screen-exam matrix, and also with Alaska Blind Child Discovery (ABCD) 3 x 3 matrix including inconclusive results (no instrument interpretation or unable to gain a reading) with inconclusive interpretations considered a referral.

Enrollment

162 patients

Sex

All

Ages

6 months to 40 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • at least one eye

Exclusion criteria

  • bilateral enucleation

Trial design

162 participants in 2 patient groups

Burma
Description:
Patients from remote Burma clinic
Treatment:
Device: photoscreen
Alaska
Description:
Patients in pediatric ophthalmology clinic
Treatment:
Device: photoscreen

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems