Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Diet quality is generally poor in rural Nepal, especially among vulnerable household members. Consumption of milk (and other animal source foods [ASF]) could contribute to improvements in diet quality. However, multiple cultural, structural and economic barriers constrain the inclusion of ASF in the diet in these households, even though most raise dairy animals. This study will
Matched clusters of villages in Kapilbastu and Nawalparasi districts (Nepal) will be randomized to Intervention or Control status. Household surveys will be conducted at baseline and 12 months later to collect demographic, diet, feeding practices, nutrition knowledge, etc. Fathers and adolescent girls will respond to mini-surveys. Growth parameters of children, adolescent girls, and WCBA will be assessed. The intervention consists of 4 components: 1) didactic training (mothers, fathers, adolescent girls), 2) participatory learning activities (mothers, fathers, adolescent girls), 3) model kitchens (mothers, adolescent girls), and 4) Nutrition Club (adolescent girls).
The primary outcome will be the impact of the intervention on diet, household feeding practices, and nutrition knowledge.
Full description
Animal-source-foods (ASF) contains nutrients essential to human health. These nutrients are especially important for vulnerable household members (young children, adolescent girls, women of child-bearing age [WCBA]). 1, 2 In developing countries, milk is generally one of the largest sources and most widely consumed animal-based dietary protein 3
Although livestock farmers are more likely than their counterparts to consume ASF 3-5, paradoxically, families that rely on agriculture and livestock production for their livelihoods are significantly food and nutrition insecure households. This is partly due to use of the income earned from livestock for purposes other than improving household diet diversity and quality, and partly due to inadequate knowledge about the importance of doing so. In addition, household food allocation practices and cultural beliefs and taboos impact ASF consumption by individual family members. ASF consumption in Nepal, for example, is often prioritized for the primary household bread winner (usually an adult male) 6. Thus, multiple cultural, structural and economic barriers converge to limit consumption of ASF by vulnerable household memb8rs.
Many governmental and non-governmental organizations attempt to improve diet quality in rural households via nutrition education in hopes of motivating behavior change among participants. However, results of such programs have been inconsistent and generally disappointing 7-9. Even programs which provide a robust agricultural intervention are not always successful in improving diets or child growth 10, 11. Therefore, the study will define the barriers to household ASF consumption in rural Nepal and introduce a package of solutions to overcome these barriers. The design of the intervention builds on prior formative work 1, 12-20 21, and will be tested in a randomized controlled trial. While young children under 5 years of age remain a strong focus of this work, adolescent girls, WCBA and fathers will also be included in the intervention activities.
This intervention addresses implementation gaps identified in the investigators' prior work and incorporates findings in recent literature regarding the effectiveness of specific behavior change interventions on nutrition outcomes 22. The investigators' previous work demonstrated that barriers to improving child nutrition are not overcome by increased income, nutrition education, or enhanced household milk production. Recent work has highlighted the value of specific components of behavior change programs: (1) demonstrations of how to perform the behavior, (2) cooking/recipe demonstrations, (3) restructuring the social environment (e.g., women's groups) and engaging with fathers and other groups not typically included, (4) providing households with prompts/cues, (5) action planning, goal-setting and problem-solving, (6) providing information about health consequences, (7) offering strategies to families to self-monitor behaviors. This planned multi-faceted intervention incorporates these elements to augment the effectiveness of behavior change messaging provided to household members, while strengthening community involvement, fostering sustainability and facilitating scaling-up activities.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,873 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Laurie Miller
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal