ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Enhancing the Efficacy of Smoking Quit Line in the Military (AFIII Renewal) (Freedom)

University of Virginia logo

University of Virginia

Status

Completed

Conditions

Efficacy of Secondary Reengagement Intervention
Initial Efficacy of Quit Line

Treatments

Behavioral: Choice Group
Behavioral: Rate reduction intervention
Behavioral: Recycling Group
Behavioral: Proactive QL

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02201810
FWH20140076H

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is a randomized clinical trial designed to measure the effectiveness of three QL interventions for smokers who failed to quit an initial smoking cessation intervention, but remain motivated to quit smoking.

Full description

In the investigators' previous QL protocol, FWH20080093H, the investigators documented that a military-tailored QL was associated with high rates of sustained smoking cessation. The proactive QL produced superior cessation rates at a one year follow-up compared to a reactive QL. Unfortunately, even with high rates of cessation, a large number of participants (the majority of participants) fail to remain quit at follow-up. Civilian QLs have observed the same marked decay of sustained cessation rates from the end of treatment to the one year follow-up.

An opportunity exists to reengage these smokers who relapse or fail to quit by the end of QL treatment. Civilian QLs use one of two treatments, Recycling (repeat the smoking cessation counseling) or Rate Reduction (cut down over time), as the primary methods for treatment reengagement. Unfortunately, these methods of reengaging the relapsed/failed to quit smoker have not been systematically evaluated. As such, we propose to randomize participants who relapse or fail to quit by the end of the intervention to either (1) repeating the proactive QL (Recycle); (2) smoking reduction with the goal of eventual cessation (Rate Reduction); or (3) the choice of Recycle or Rate Reduction (Choice). Efficacy will be established by assessing both point prevalence and continuous abstinence at a 12 month follow-up.

All participants (approximately 1900) are consented to follow-up treatment reengagement since we do not know a priori who will quit and who will not quit/relapse. The investigators anticipate, based on the investigators' QL study that about 30% will quit and remain quit based on the eight-week proactive QL and about 70% will either not quit or relapse (n≈1300). Those that are smoking at the three-month follow-up are stratified (based on whether they quit and relapsed vs. not quitting at all in the Proactive QL based upon self-report) and randomized to the three treatment reengagement strategies (Recycle, Rate Reduction, or Choice), each one lasting 8 weeks. Then, at one year follow-up, the investigators will assess both point prevalence and continuous abstinence. Since we are intervening on those that initially failed to quit or relapsed, continuous abstinence will be defined from the point of the last treatment reengagement intervention (one year from that point).

Enrollment

614 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: To be included, individuals will be

  • Active Duty, Retired, or Dependent with Tricare benefits
  • Participants must be at least 18 years old
  • Smoked five or more cigarettes a day for at least one year
  • Live in the 48 contiguous states, Alaska or Hawaii
  • Participants must have the ability to understand consent procedures, and have access to a telephone for participation
  • Seriously thinking of quitting smoking cigarettes in the next 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons who have a known or unknown knowledge of an allergy or hypersensitivity to Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the next 12 months
  • Persons diagnosed with an unstable heart condition will be excluded as NRT is contraindicated in these groups

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

614 participants in 3 patient groups

2nd level intervention: Rate Reduction
Experimental group
Description:
Rate reduction intervention
Treatment:
Behavioral: Rate reduction intervention
Behavioral: Proactive QL
2nd level intervention: Recycling
Experimental group
Description:
Recycling Group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Recycling Group
Behavioral: Proactive QL
2nd level intervention: Choice
Experimental group
Description:
Choice Group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Choice Group
Behavioral: Proactive QL

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems