ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Enhancing the Therapeutic Effect of Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With a Hybrid Bracing Protocol

The Chinese University of Hong Kong logo

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)

Treatments

Other: Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing
Other: Hybrid Bracing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07045337
14119721 (Other Grant/Funding Number)
GRF 14119721

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the therapeutic effect of the Hybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) over the Conventional Brace in enhancing In-brace Correction (IBC) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS).

Full description

Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity and AIS is the commonest with a high prevalence of 2-4%. If left untreated, AIS can progress resulting in significant health problems including back degeneration and negative body images.

Bracing, such as Underarm Brace(UAB) used in our center, is indicated for skeletally immature patients with Cobb angle>20°. Another bracing system is a nighttime Lateral Bending Brace(LBB) designed in a bending position opposite to the convexity of the curve thus resulting in its overcorrection. If AIS becomes severe despite bracing, ultra-major surgery is indicated aiming at bony fusion of the deformed segment with instrumentation. It is therefore important to maximize treatment effectiveness with bracing to control curve progression and to avoid the need for surgery. In-brace Correction(IBC) is the percentage reduction in Cobb angle with bracing.

Studies have reported IBC is an important determinant of brace effectiveness. For enhancement of IBC, we put forward the Hybrid Bracing Protocol(HyBP) combining the use of daytime UAB and nighttime LBB. To be best of our knowledge, HyBP has never been reported in the literature. Our pilot study on 8 patients treated with HyBP and 8 Cobb-matched historical controls treated with fulltime UAB showed very promising results with IBC of 42.1±22.0% and 22.1±14.9% in the HyBP and control group respectively. We therefore propose a formal prospective rater-blinded randomized controlled trial on 120 skeletally immature AIS female subjects with single thoracolumbar or lumbar curve newly prescribed with bracing. They are randomly allocated to the HyBP Group or the Conventional Brace Group (CB Group). The primary objective is to determine if the HyBP Group has better treatment effect in terms of In-brace Correction (IBC) when compared with the CB group at 3-month and 18-month after bracing. This is a 3-year study proposal representing the first phase of a project, to be followed by the second phase of the project when all subjects of the entire cohort will be assessed on curve outcome at time of completion of bracing and at 2 years post-bracing. This study will carry significant clinical impacts in that, if proven useful, the HyBP can be used for enhancement of treatment outcomes with bracing, thus preventing the scoliotic spine from deterioration and to avoid the need for surgery.

Enrollment

120 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

10 to 18 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Females with AIS diagnosed after detailed clinical and radiological evaluation by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon and
  2. having a single lumbar or thoracolumbar curve with Cobb angle between 20° - 40° and
  3. age 10 years and older when bracing is prescribed and
  4. Risser 0 to 2 and
  5. either pre-menarchal or less than 1 year post-menarchal and
  6. with no prior treatment for scoliosis

Exclusion criteria

  1. presenting with associated musculoskeletal, neurological or other conditions possibly responsible for the curvature
  2. with previous surgical or orthotic treatment or
  3. physical or mental disability that prevent patients from complying with the bracing protocol

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

120 participants in 2 patient groups

Hybrid Bracing
Experimental group
Description:
Hybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) combining the use of daytime Underarm Brace (UAB) and a nighttime Lateral Bending Brace
Treatment:
Other: Hybrid Bracing
Conventional fulltime underarm bracing (UAB)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Conventional group uses fulltime underarm bracing (UAB)
Treatment:
Other: Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems