Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED). Efficacy is assessed by using a composite score consisting of 30-day all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and recurrent angina requiring revascularization.
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Increased bleeding risk as defined by any of the following:
Impaired hemostasis including any one of the following:
Angina from a secondary cause such as:
Bundle branch block not known to be old in the context of angina.
Undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the past 24 hours.
A known allergy to heparin, low molecular weight heparin, pork or pork products.
Any contraindications to treatment with UFH or LMWH.
A recent (<48 hours) or planned spinal/epidural anesthesia or puncture.
Thrombolytic therapy within the preceding 24 hours.
Any other clinically relevant serious diseases, including severe liver disease or renal failure [creatinine clearance <30 mL/min], rendering implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult.
Treatment with other investigational agents or devices within the previous 30 days, planned use of investigational drugs or devices, or has previously enrolled in this trial.
Inability to comply with the protocol (e.g., has uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits).
Inability to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study or is otherwise unable to provide informed consent.
A prosthetic heart valve
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal