Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will assess the efficacy of catheter ablation versus the Wolf Mini-Maze surgical ablation for rhythm control in patients with persistent afib.
Full description
Higher success rates have been achieved after a single surgical ablation when compared to catheter ablation, however contiguous and transmural lesions are not always guaranteed.
Even though, catheter ablation is now being offered for symptomatic persistent AF, recurrence after the index procedure in such a persistent AF substrate is not unusual. Redo-catheter ablation is routinely offered for such patients; however long term success still remains low. Non-pulmonary vein triggers are often targeted in such redo-catheter ablation procedures; though this approach remains controversial. More recently, the Wolf Mini-Maze procedure has been utilized with promising results.
This study proposes to randomize a group of persistent AF patients to undergo either catheter ablation or the surgical mini-maze procedure with left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
0 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal