Ethyl Chloride Versus 5% Lidocaine for Topical Anesthesia of Oral Mucosa

Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine

Status: Completed

Conditions: Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis; Pain

Treatments: Procedure: 5% lidocaine gel; Procedure: Ethyl chloride

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05306470

Local Anesthetic

Details and patient eligibility

About

Local anesthesia in the oral cavity is a pain full experience for the patient. All means should be made to reduce the pain and anxiety of the patient for needle stick procedures. My study aims in elevating the pain experienced by the patient during this procedure by using either cold application with ethyl chloride or 5% lidocaine gel.

Full description

Local anesthetic procedure is always a dreadful experience for the patient specially for the patients who are already in pain . It is a job of the dentist to provide a painless dental treatment from the very beginning. Most dental procedures require administration of local anesthesia for a painless procedure with local anesthesia procedure being painful itself with the administration of needle in the oral cavity. Dentist everyday in their practice utilise various techniques and procedures in alleviating this painful experience with either application of lidocaine gel or spray . Numbing the oral mucosa with cold application is well documented and tested therefore my study aims in application of ethyl chloride spray on cotton pallet for a duration of 30 seconds in producing the desired numbing effect of the oral mucosa before infiltration of local anesthesia in alleviating the needle prick sensation perceived by the patient.

Pain level is assigned to one of four categorical scores using visual analogue scale

1. :None(0)
2. : Mild (1-3)
3. : Moderate (4-6)
4. : Severe (7-10)

Enrollment: 90 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• No medical history
• No age restrictions
• Patients suffering from Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis requiring buccal infiltration

Exclusion criteria

• Patients having any medical conditions considered to affect patient safety or the quality of the study
• if they had any known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics of amide type or any of the other contents in the substance used

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

90 participants in 3 patient groups

Ethyl chloride

Experimental group

Description:

Pre cooling done by the application of single spray ethyl chloride on a cotton pellet and placed for 30 seconds at the injection site for numbing effect

Treatment:

Procedure: Ethyl chloride

5% lidocaine gel

Experimental group

Description:

5% lidocaine gel 2ml applied on a cotton pallet for 30 seconds on the oral mucosa at the site of injection for the numbing effect

Treatment:

Procedure: 5% lidocaine gel

control

No Intervention group

Description:

Local anesthesia infiltration is administrated without using any numbing agent