Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
To assess the efficacy of dronedarone versus placebo for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after electrical, pharmacological or spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL).
To assess the efficacy of dronedarone versus placebo on AF/AFL-related symptoms.
To assess the efficacy of dronedarone versus placebo on ventricular rate control in case of AF/AFL recurrence.
Full description
This is a double-blind, parallel arm, placebo-controlled, multicentre, multinational, phase III study.
To be eligible, patients must be in normal sinus rhythm at randomisation and must have an ECG-documented history of recent AF/AFL reverted to normal sinus rhythm by electrical, pharmacological or spontaneous conversion
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Women of childbearing potential without adequate birth control, Pregnant women, Breastfeeding women, Congestive heart failure NYHA class III or IV, Conditions which increase the risk of severe antiarrhythmic drug side effects, Severe associated conditions.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
615 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal