ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluating Impact and Implementation of Choose to Move (Phase 3) (CTM)

University of British Columbia logo

University of British Columbia

Status

Completed

Conditions

Aging
Physical Inactivity
Loneliness
Mobility Limitation
Social Isolation

Treatments

Behavioral: Choose to Move

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05497648
H15-02522
PJT-153248 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The objectives of this study are to 1) evaluate whether Choose to Move (CTM) improves health outcomes in older adults who participate and 2) assess whether CTM is delivered as planned and what factors support or inhibit delivery at scale.

CTM is a 6 month, choice-based program for low active older adults being scaled-up across British Columbia, Canada. The goals of CTM are to enhance physical activity, mobility and social connectedness in older adults living in British Columbia, Canada.

Full description

CTM is a 6 month, choice-based program for low active older adults being scaled-up in phases across British Columbia, Canada. Within CTM (phase 3), trained activity coaches support older adults in three ways. First, in a one-on-one consultation, activity coaches help participants to set goals and create action plans for physical activity tailored to each person's interests and abilities. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. Second, activity coaches facilitate a series of group meetings with small groups of participants. Finally, activity coaches regularly check in with participants to provide ongoing support. Activity coaches and recreation departments across BC are trained and provided with resources to deliver CTM.

Objectives:

  1. To assess the impact (effectiveness) of CTM (phase 3) delivered at scale on the physical activity, mobility and social connectedness of older adults (Part I - Impact Evaluation)
  2. To assess whether the program was implemented as planned (fidelity) and investigate factors that support or inhibit implementation at scale (Part II - Implementation Evaluation).

Study Design:

We use a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation (Curran et al 2012) pre-post study design to evaluate CTM. We use mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) and collect data at 0 (baseline), 3 (mid-intervention), 6 (post-intervention) and 18 (12-months post-intervention) months to assess effectiveness and implementation of CTM.

Enrollment

1,216 patients

Sex

All

Ages

60+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria (older adults):

  • ≥60 years of age,
  • demonstrate readiness for physical activity via the PAR-Q+ questionnaire (Warburton et al 2011), Get Active Questionnaire (Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology 2017) or a letter of recommendation from their physician
  • <150 min/week physical activity
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria (older adults):

  • previous participation in CTM

Inclusion Criteria (delivery partners):

  • Activity coaches will be English speaking BCRPA Registered Older Adult Fitness Leaders or Kinesiologists who are delivering CTM at participating centres
  • Recreation Managers and Coordinators affiliated with participating centres delivering CTM
  • Provincial Partners (e.g., individuals/partners who make strategic and/or policy decisions) at partner organizations delivering Choose to Move

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

1,216 participants in 1 patient group

Choose to Move
Experimental group
Description:
Individuals responsible for delivering Choose to Move and older adults enrolled in Choose to Move
Treatment:
Behavioral: Choose to Move

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems