ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluating the Relative Effectiveness of Two Feeding Interventions for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition

T

The Hospital for Sick Children

Status

Completed

Conditions

Child Nutrition Disorders

Treatments

Dietary Supplement: RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®
Dietary Supplement: Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil.

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01097889
1000013545

Details and patient eligibility

About

Supplementary feeding programs for children with moderate acute malnutrition have been implemented in developing countries using treatment foods with minimal or no evidence of their effectiveness. Fortified peanut paste is a popular new treatment food for children with severe and moderate malnutrition.

Objectives: To investigate the relative effectiveness of two non-identical therapeutic foods in children with moderate malnutrition by comparing differences in performance indicators (i.e. recovery rates), recovery times, and change in weight-for-height z-scores in each group.

This proposed research project will evaluate the relative effectiveness of two non-identical treatment foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in children

Full description

This research protocol will be embedded as a component of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) -supported Supplementary Feeding programmes in Ethiopia. The proposed study is a prospective cluster-randomized equivalence trial that will compare the relative effectiveness of two feeding interventions in four woredas (districts). Research will be implemented in two comparable woredas (one with CSB and one with RUSF), in two different areas in Sidama zone that represent different livelihood zones, main source of crop income, and level of food insecurity

Enrollment

2,600 patients

Sex

All

Ages

6 to 60 months old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • All children 6 to 60 months of age who are identified as malnourished based on MUAC measurements with WFH ≥70 to <80%.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with WFH < 70% or presenting with bilateral pitting oedema (they will be referred to therapeutic feeding programme).
  • Children with any illness or clinical condition that prevents them from safely ingesting either supplementary foods. A child is medically assessed upon admission for any complicated clinical condition (oedema, malaria, vomiting, chronic diarrhea, infections, appetite, etc) that would require medical care and those children will be referred to the therapeutic feeding programme.
  • All children transferred from the therapeutic feeding programme directly into the supplementary feeding programme - however they will not be included in the research study.
  • Children with WFH > 80% but MUAC 110 to 120 mm- they will be admitted to SFP however will not be included in the research study.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

2,600 participants in 2 patient groups

Treatment Group 1
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: Fortified blended foods, Corn Soya Bean Flour (CSB) with oil.
Treatment Group 2
Experimental group
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: RUSF (ready-to-use supplementary foods) Supplementary Plumpy®

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems