Evaluation of a Long Versus Short Clomid Protocol for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation
Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a long Clomid protocol as compared to a 5-day Clomid protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization. The aim of the long Clomid protocol is to intensify stimulation of the ovaries and reduce both cost and injection burden for patients. Participants will be randomized to receive the long Clomid protocol vs. the typical protocol involving Clomid only for 5 days followed by growth hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. The primary outcome the investigators will evaluate will be the number of mature eggs retrieved.
Full description
Clomiphene citrate (Clomid) is often used for assisted reproductive technologies and may be used to augment ovarian stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins by stimulating pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release in addition. The mechanism of action of Clomid is antagonism at the estrogen receptor, and this stimulates FSH release from the pituitary. The typical Clomid-based protocol has involved clomid only given for the first five days of stimulation to allow for endometrial development later in the cycle for a fresh embryo transfer following the oocyte retrieval. This protocol involves the addition of a GnRH antagonist medication later in the cycle to prevent premature ovulation. Recent national trends in IVF, however, have moved towards frozen embryo transfers and use of preimplantation genetic testing, which obviates any concerns regarding the endometrium. Recent experience in our clinic has suggested that Clomid may also prevent premature ovulation by antagonizing the positive feedback that is responsible for the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and ovulation. Given in this manner, Clomid can be given throughout the duration of an ovarian stimulation cycle, achieve higher FSH levels and degree of ovarian stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve, and obviate the need for GnRH antagonist medication (another expensive subcutaneous injection). The objective of this study is to compare a "long Clomid protocol" (i.e. using Clomid throughout the entire duration of the IVF cycle) as compared to the typical 5-day clomid protocol. The investigators hypothesize that the long Clomid protocol will be non-inferior to the typical five-day course and obviate the need for GnRH antagonist by preventing premature ovulation. Patients with diminished ovarian reserve and anticipated poor response to ovarian stimulation will be randomized to the long Clomid protocol vs. a 5-day Clomid with GnRH antagonist protocol. The primary outcome will be oocyte yield. Secondary outcome will be premature ovulation, embryo development, and pregnancy outcomes.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
- Undergoing IVF
- Must meet POSEIDON criteria based on clinic evaluation
- Female partner: Antral follicle count of 2 or more and age <45 at time of stimulation start
- Male partner/sperm source: Cannot be azoospermic
- Planning freeze-all cycle (regardless of blastocyst or cleavage stage culture) or fresh transfer if randomized to short Clomid group
- Planning 36-hour trigger window
Exclusion criteria
- Normal ovarian reserve or good response
- Allergy or adverse reaction to Clomid
- Minimal stimulation protocols
- History of prior premature ovulation
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
120 participants in 2 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Richard Paulson; Rachel Mandelbaum
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal