ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of a Mental Health Physician Support Program in Nova Scotia

N

Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Treatments

Other: Mental Health Practice Support Program
Other: Treatment as Usual

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01975948
CDHA-RS/2014-150

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to test the program's effectiveness in a primary care setting in reducing stigma among medical personnel, increasing the comfort level of physicians and staff in providing care to those living with mental illness, and in improving client well-being and mental health.

Full description

Skill-based approaches are effective in reducing stigma in health professionals.

Overview: The Nova Scotia (NS) Department of Health and Wellness and the Mental Health Commission of Canada launched a demonstration project in NS-Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program. Originating in British Columbia (BC), it uses a novel learning platform which supports primary healthcare providers with treatment and management of mental illness. We hypothesized that enhanced skills in program participants would lead to increased comfort on the part of practitioners, diminished social distance and stigmatization; improved clinical outcomes and a reduction in healthcare costs.

This evaluation has three co-primary objectives:

  • To determine whether the Mental Health Practice Support Program (PSP) leads to lower levels of stigma among physicians participating in the program.
  • To determine whether participation in the Mental Health PSP leads to lower levels of stigma among medical office assistants (MOAs)
  • To determine whether participation of physicians in the Mental Health PSP leads to greater improvement in depressive symptom ratings among patients they are treating for depression, compared to treatment as usual.

Two secondary objectives:

  • To determine whether participation in the PSP leads to improved occupational functioning compared to treatment as usual.
  • To assess the impact of participation in the Mental Health PSP on healthcare costs.

Four exploratory objectives:

  • To assess physicians' confidence and comfort in the management of depression treatment
  • To determine whether physician participation int he Mental Health PSP is associated with a reduced frequency of antidepressant prescribing.
  • To determine whether the patients of physicians participating in the Mental Health PSP report higher levels of satisfaction with the treatment that they receive.
  • To determine whether patients participation in the Mental Health PSP is associated with improved quality of life.

Methods: Seventy seven practices with one hundred and eleven community-based family physicians were recruited. Each practice was assigned a practice number. Each physician within the practice was assigned a unique identifier number. Individual practitioner or practice teams were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Randomization was stratified on the total number of physicians per practice, as well as urban or rural setting to ensure equal distribution of practice clusters and urban and rural groups. STATA, version 12 [College Station, TX, 2012] to generate the sequence for practice [cluster] randomization. Random numbers were generated from a binomial distribution with a probability of success of 0.5. Intervention group participants attended 3 half-day workshops with a "6- week action period" between workshops to practice learnings. Practice support was provided through diagnostic assessment tools, evidence based self-management tools, and on-site practice support coordinator support. A stigma-assessment tool, the Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare Providers (OMS-HC), was administered to both groups at intervention group pre-training, and post-training. Providers comfort and confidence in diagnosing and managing mental illness was also assessed, at comparable times.

Upon completion of the intervention group training, physicians from both groups were asked to identify 3 consecutive evaluable patients. Patients were enrolled and allocated to intervention or control groups as per their associated physician.

Enrollment

285 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Physician sample:

  • A valid license to practice in Nova Scotia.
  • The provision of informed consent.

Patient sample:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Depression defined by PHQ-9 score of > 10.
  • > 18 years old.
  • Able to read and speak English.
  • Sufficiently intact cognitive functioning (physician judgement).
  • Free of urgent or emergent medical or psychiatric issues e.g. unstable cardiovascular disease, suicidal ideation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not currently under treatment for depression either with an antidepressant medication or psychotherapy.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

285 participants in 4 patient groups

Mental Health PSP: Physicians
Experimental group
Description:
Physicians training in Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program
Treatment:
Other: Mental Health Practice Support Program
Treatment as Usual: Physicians
Active Comparator group
Description:
Those administering treatment as usual for depression
Treatment:
Other: Treatment as Usual
Mental Health PSP: Patients
Experimental group
Description:
Those belonging to a physician who has completed the Adult Mental Health Practice Support Program training.
Treatment:
Other: Mental Health Practice Support Program
Treatment as Usual: Patients
Active Comparator group
Description:
Those receiving treatment as usual for depression
Treatment:
Other: Treatment as Usual

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems