ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of Air Abrasion Surface Pretreatment in the Repairing Capacity of Defective Composite Restoration

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Repair

Treatments

Device: Air abrasion sandblasting aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3) AquaCare single (Velopex, Medivance Instruments Ltd., London, UK)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05500430
repair defective restoration

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study is conducted to compare the efficacy of surface pretreatment using air abrasion sandblasting aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3) versus not pretreatment in the repair capacity of defective composite restoration indicated for repair.

Full description

First the rationale for the repair, rather than the replacement of defective direct composite restorations proved a less invasive procedure with decreased tooth loss avoiding weakening and overtreatment of tooth. Less traumatic or stressful than replacement for patients with good acceptance; Increased longevity of the restoration; Reduction of potentially harmful effects on the dental pulp and Less risk of iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth.

Secondary using surface treatment strategies aim to prepare a clean surface with high surface energy to provide better wettability with adequate surface roughness and surface area by removing the superficial layer of the aged composite which lead to increase integrity between old and new resin restoration.

Enrollment

39 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
  • patient with occlusal defects class I or class II composite resin restorations indicated for repair.

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergic history concerning methacrylate.

  • Rampant caries.

    • Disabilities patient
    • Pregnancy
    • Heavy smoking.
    • Xerostomia.
    • Lack of compliance.
    • Evidence of parafunctional habits.
    • Temporomandibular joint disorders.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

39 participants in 2 patient groups

surface pretreatment sandblasting
Experimental group
Description:
Air abrasion sandblasting aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3) Aqua Care single (London, UK) will be done for the defective area then repairing with bioactive injectable composite, Beautiful Flow Plus X F00 (Shofu, Japan). The surface treatment for aged composite will be applied according to manufacturer instructions. Repairing with bioactive injectable composite, Beautiful Flow Plus X F00(Shofu, Japan) The material will be applied according to manufacturer instructions. After shade selection incremental insertion in layers not exceeding 2 mm and light curing for 10 sec using 3M Eliper curing unite (Elipar Deepcure-S, 3M).
Treatment:
Device: Air abrasion sandblasting aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3) AquaCare single (Velopex, Medivance Instruments Ltd., London, UK)
Repairing with conventional nanohybrid composite
Active Comparator group
Description:
The nanohybrid resin composite will be applied to the the cavity using the conventional incremental technique according to manufacturer instructions.
Treatment:
Device: Air abrasion sandblasting aluminum oxide particles (Al2O3) AquaCare single (Velopex, Medivance Instruments Ltd., London, UK)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

mai mamdouh, Professor; Ahmed salah, master

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems