Evaluation of Double Faced Transverse Preputial Onlay Island Flap for Hypospadias Repair in Pediatrics (DFOF#TIOF)

dr. Muhammad Abdelhafez Mahmoud, MD

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hypospadias

Treatments

Procedure: Transverse inner preputial onlay island flap

Procedure: Double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05144659

Al-Azhar DFOF versus TIOF

Details and patient eligibility

About

Evaluation of double faced transverse preputial onlay island flap for hypospadias repair in pediatrics. The preputial onlay island flap technique has been popularized for hypospadias repair as a result of offering a consistent combination of excellent cosmetic results and acceptable complication rates. Like other techniques, urethrocutaneous fistulae continue to be the most common complications, in addition to other complications, and can be attributed to the affection of flaps vascularity. Some authors describe a technique that resolves some of these problems by combining the unique benefits of the double-faced preputial flaps.

This study aimed to evaluate double faced preputial onlay island flap technique for complication rate, outcomes for urinary stream, and cosmetic results.

Full description

Type of study: prospective RCT

Review of literature:

Different previous techniques for the repair of various levels of penile shaft hypospadias with chordee.
Demonstration of two different well-established techniques for repair of anterior, mid-penile, and posterior penile hypospadias without or with mild curvature.
Disadvantages of two-stage urethroplasty or technique as transverse inner preputial onlay island flap that involves dissection of the flap from its dorsal preputial tissue (as it affects the flap vascularity).
Merits of single-stage urethroplasty double-faced preputial onlay island flap (as it combines the benefits of vascularized pedicled flap, provides better functional and cosmetic results, and low complication rate).

This study will be conducted at pediatric surgery department at Al-Houssain and Sayed Galal University Medical Centers, in the period from May 2019 to February 2021, on 68 male patients with anterior, mid-penile, and posterior penile hypospadias without or with mild curvature.

Patients will be investigated by routine laboratory tests for fitness for surgery. All of them will undergo one-stage repair using either of 2 techniques of urethroplasty; double-faced preputial onlay island flap versus transverse inner preputial onlay island flap.

Written informed consent will be signed by the parents of all participants in the study.

Institutes of the study: A multicenter study at pediatric surgery departments, Al-Azhar University Medical Centers in Cairo, Egypt.

Number of cases: Sixty-eight male patients. Time frame: 3 years.

Ethical Consideration:

The protocol will be discussed and approved by the Ethics and Institutional Review Board Committee at the investigators' hospitals. The procedures and the aim of the study will be clearly explained to the patient and the family. Written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment of the patients into the study. The family's refusal to give consent for one-stage repair is respected but does not deprive the patient of getting surgical care by two-stage repair.

Preoperative preparation:

All patients will be subjected to history taking, clinical examination, and necessary laboratory investigations (CBC, Coagulation profile, Urinalysis). Participants will receive a dose of single broad-spectrum antibiotic 30 min-1 hour before surgery.

Patients will be randomly divided (using non-transparent closed envelope randomization method) into two equal groups, each will include 34 patients; Group A will undergo double faced preputial onlay island flap and Group B will undergo transverse inner preputial onlay island flap. All operations were done by the same surgical team.

Follow-up: patients will be followed-up at OPD at 1, 3, 12, and 24 months, for incidence of any complications. HOSE score questionnaire will be used for the evaluation of outcomes.

Statistical Analysis:

Data will be presented as mean, standard deviation, number & percentage. For qualitative data, Chi-square test (X2) is used to compare between the two groups and independent-samples t-test of significance is used when comparing between two means. The significance level is set at P <0.05. Statistical analysis will be performed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 23.0, IBM Corp, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY, USA.

Discussion:

It will focus on one-stage repair for anterior, mid-penile, and posterior penile hypospadias without or with mild penile curvature using double-faced preputial onlay island flap in comparison to inner preputial onlay island flap.

The results obtained from this study will be compared between both groups and with those reported in the literature.

Also, it will focus on results, complications, their management, and clinical evaluation by Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation (HOSE) questionnaire evaluation tool. Finally, the investigators will conclude the reconstructive technique that gives the better results and least morbidity.

Enrollment

68 patients

Sex

Male

Ages

1 to 14 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Young male pediatric patients diagnosed as anterior, mid-penile, or posterior penile hypospadias
with shallow and narrow urethral plate measuring less than 6 millimeters,
without or with mild penile curvature of less than 30º after degloving of the penis.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with wide urethral plate suitable for tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty,
other types of hypospadias as penoscrotal, scrotal, perineal hypospadias,
patients with moderate or severe penile curvature,
recurrent cases, and
operations done by other surgeons