Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the ability of two European Union (EU) regulated gel to foam toothpaste formulations versus a non-fluoride toothpaste using a modified in-situ model of dental erosion and remineralization. A positive control i.e fluoride containing toothpaste marketed in EU will also be compared to non-fluoride toothpaste.
Full description
The aim of this study is to assess the remineralization effects of two EU gel to foam toothpaste formulations with 1450 parts per million (ppm) of fluoride as sodium fluoride (NaF) and 5% potassium nitrate (KNO3) versus a non-fluoride (0 ppm F)/KNO3 toothpaste as a negative control. The two experimental gel to foam toothpaste formulations differ in their relative dentine abrasivity (RDA) values which is an in-vitro measure of a toothpaste abrasivity to the dentinal tissues. A marketed toothpaste containing NaF and KNO3 will serve as a positive control.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
General and Oral Health: Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically OST and OHT examinations.
Oral Requirements:
Contraception: Women of childbearing potential who are, in the opinion of the investigator, practicing a reliable method of contraception.
Exclusion criteria
Oral Health:
Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
Clinical Study/Experimental Medication:
Substance abuse: Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.
Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study
Breast-feeding: Women who are breast-feeding
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
56 participants in 4 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal