Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The main purpose of this study is to determine if standard and investigational tests used to help diagnose and treat food allergies can provide information that will be useful in determining the cause of dyspepsia and helpful in designing a treatment plan. The study will also determine if there is a connection between positive allergy tests and inflammation in the upper abdomen.
Full description
Recurrent abdominal pain is the most common type of pain in school age children and young adolescents. Over 80% of these children have pain in the upper abdomen which is diagnosed as functional dyspepsia (FD). Many of these children are also found to have eosinophilic duodenitis (ED). ED is a type of inflammation in the lining of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by an increase in eosinophils. An increase in intestinal eosinophils is a finding also seen with food allergy upon exposure to the offending antigen. The presence of intestinal eosinophilia in ED would suggest an allergic mechanism may be involved in the generation of pain and other symptoms associated with ED. Endoscopy and biopsy are used to aid in the identification of ED, which often is followed by elimination diets and food challenges to identify the offending allergen. This approach is both invasive (due to endoscopy) and cumbersome (due to the complexity and restrictiveness of the elimination diet). The value of screening for food hypersensitivities in children with ED has not been well characterized despite the theoretical links between food hypersensitivities, gut inflammation, and symptoms of dyspepsia. The current study will determine if standard and investigational tests used to evaluate food hypersensitivity have the potential to be used as biomarkers to direct treatment of children with ED.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria (patient goup):
Exclusion Criteria (healthy control group)
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
41 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal