ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of Furcal Perforation Repair in Primary Molars With MTA Versus Bioceramics (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

A

Ahmad Elheeny

Status

Completed

Conditions

Iatrogenic Perforation of Primary Molars

Treatments

Other: Bioceramics

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Furcal perforation is one of the most challenging procedural accidents during pulpotomy of primary molars and should be sealed as soon as possible to prevent bacterial invasion at perforation site and subsequent tooth extraction. The aim of the study is to compare bioceramics versus MTA as root repair material for treatment of furcal perforation in primary molars

Enrollment

76 patients

Sex

All

Ages

4 to 7 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Apparently healthy children aged from 4 to 7 years
  • No history of spontaneous pain or swelling
  • No signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpits or loss of vitality
  • Absence of radicular or priapical lesions.
  • Accidental furcal perforation should be immediate or mediate (within two weeks) perforation in primary molars.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with systemic disease
  • Presence of priapical lesions

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

76 participants in 2 patient groups

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Root repair material
Treatment:
Other: Bioceramics
bioceramics
Experimental group
Description:
Root repair material
Treatment:
Other: Bioceramics

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems