Evaluation of How Different Dosages of Spinal Manipulation Modulate Spinal Stiffness in Participants With Back Pain

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Status: Completed

Conditions: Back Pain

Treatments: Procedure: Spinal manipulative therapy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03063177

UQTR_2017_dose_stiffness

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study evaluate the relationships between spinal manipulative therapy dosage (speed and peak force), the resulting modulation of thoracic spinal stiffness and changes in the clinical status in participants with chronic thoracic pain. Participants will attend four sessions of one hour over 2 weeks. During session 1 to 3, participants will receive one of three different spinal manipulative therapy dosages based on their group assignment and preceded and followed by the measurement of their thoracic spinal stiffness. Session 4 will include spinal stiffness measurement and clinical status evaluation through questionnaires.

Full description

Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is based on the premise that clinicians can identify spine mechanical changes and accordingly determine the dosage of its biomechanical parameters: preload force, rate of force application and peak force. In recent years, our research team showed, using an apparatus to deliver specific dosage SMTs, that SMT-related neurophysiological responses depend on the dosage of these parameters. Beside determining the SMT dosage, clinicians have to select the spinal level to be treated which is partly done by applying a light pressure to each spinous process (spinal stiffness assessment). This study consist of a randomized controlled trial including 75 participants with chronic thoracic pain who will be randomized in one of three groups. Based on their group assignment, participants will receive a specific dosage SMT delivered at T7 three times over 2 weeks. These SMT dosages are distinct regarding their speed and/or their peak force in order to generate either a high vertebral displacement or a high muscle reflex response. T6, T7 and T8 spinal stiffness will be measured just before and after treatment and clinical status will be assessed at each session beginning through questionnaires. Session four will include the questionnaires and the spinal stiffness measurement procedure. Both SMT and spinal stiffness measurement will be performed using an apparatus aiming at simulating force-time profiles. Surface electromyography electrodes and accelerometers will be positioned over the upper back skin in order to measure the muscle response and vertebral displacement during SMT and spinal stiffness measurement procedures.

Enrollment: 81 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 60 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Adults aged between 18 and 60 years hold and presenting a constant or recurrent pain in the thoracic area for at least 12 weeks. Thoracic are is defined as the region boarded superiorly by T1 spinous process, inferiorly by T12 spinous process and laterally by the lateral border of the thoracic erector spinae muscles. The pain has to be of non organic origin.

Exclusion criteria

• Spinal arthritis, aortic aneurysm, collagenosis, advanced osteoporosis, spine surgery, neuromuscular disease, current cancer, uncontrolled hypertension, thoracic radiculopathy, thoracic herniated disc, current infection, thoracic scoliosis, current pregnancy, any contraindication to spinal manipulative therapy of the thoracic spine.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

81 participants in 4 patient groups

1840Newtons/s(N/s);125ms;250 Newtons(N)

Experimental group

Description:

Participants will receive a spinal manipulative therapy of 20 Newtons (N) preload leading to a peak force of 250N over 125ms (rate of force application of 1840N/s).

Treatment:

Procedure: Spinal manipulative therapy

920N/s;125ms;135N

Experimental group

Description:

Participants will receive a spinal manipulative therapy of 20N preload leading to a peak force of 135N over 125ms (rate of force application of 920N/s).

Treatment:

Procedure: Spinal manipulative therapy

920N/s;250ms;250N

Experimental group

Description:

Participants will receive a spinal manipulative therapy of 20N preload leading to a peak force of 250N over 250ms (rate of force application of 920N/s).

Treatment:

Procedure: Spinal manipulative therapy

control

No Intervention group

Description:

Spinal stiffness will be assessed at each sesssion, however, participants won't receive any spinal manipulative therapy.