ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After the Construction of Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis for Limited Mouth Opening in Maxillofacial Cases : Cross Over Randomized Clinical Trial

M

Mansoura University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction
Maxilofacial

Treatments

Other: The patient will be instructed about wearing the prosthesis. First, seat the prosthesis in a posterior undercut, then rotate the prosthesis slightly superiorly in the defect area and engage the anteri

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07079384
R.25.04.3

Details and patient eligibility

About

A patient's quality of life is frequently negatively impacted by oral cancer, which is a serious condition. Treatment for oral cancer, which includes radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, can result in several oral complications. The risk of impression material becoming lodged in undercuts and the challenges in retrieving the material would be inconvenient for both the patient and the dentist. Therefore, a digital pathway was chosen for the prosthesis fabrication process So, the present study aims to investigate the patient comfort and satisfaction after the construction of maxillary interim obturator for radiation-induced trismus in maxillofacial cases with different approaches: conventional and digital fabrication processes.

Full description

A patient's quality of life is frequently negatively impacted by oral cancer, which is a serious condition. Treatment for oral cancer, which includes radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, can result in several oral complications, including trismus, xerostomia, dysgeusia, odontogenic infections, and osteoradionecrosis.

Aim: the present study aims to investigate the patient comfort and satisfaction after the construction of maxillary interim obturator for radiation-induced trismus in maxillofacial cases with different approaches: conventional and digital fabrication processes.

Methodology: The present crossover study will be conducted on 30 maxillofacial patients with maxillary defect with limited mouth opening, aged between 50 -65 years, will be selected for the study from the Maxillofacial clinic of the Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.A preliminary impression of the maxillary defect will be made with a high-viscosity irreversible hydrocolloid, covering all the margins of the defect and blocking all unfavorable undercuts with wet gauge piece.In a simple randomized method, 15 patients will receive obturator fabricated by the digital method.The other 15 patients will receive obturator fabricated by the conventional method Patient comfort and satisfaction by visual analogue scale (VAS), and Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ) at follow-up periods as follows: T0 immediately after insertion of obturator, T1= three months after insertion of obturator, T2=six months after insertion of obturator.

Enrollment

30 patients

Sex

All

Ages

55 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patient with unilateral total maxillectomy.

Free from any signs of inflammation in the defect area. The defect size is large.

Exclusion criteria

Patient is still receiving radiation. The defect size is small. Defects result from trauma.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

30 participants in 2 patient groups

patients will receive obturator fabricated by the conventional method
Active Comparator group
Description:
Hollow bulb obturator plate (using lost salt technique) will be made over the obtained cast. The obturator will be finished \& polished, and delivered to the patient.
Treatment:
Other: The patient will be instructed about wearing the prosthesis. First, seat the prosthesis in a posterior undercut, then rotate the prosthesis slightly superiorly in the defect area and engage the anteri
patients will receive obturator fabricated by the digital method
Active Comparator group
Description:
Extraoral scanning will be done for the cast and the virtual model will be generated by using the digital software and exported as a standard tessellation language (STL) file. The STL file was imported into CAD software - The designed two parts will be exported as an STL file and upload into the 3D printer software.
Treatment:
Other: The patient will be instructed about wearing the prosthesis. First, seat the prosthesis in a posterior undercut, then rotate the prosthesis slightly superiorly in the defect area and engage the anteri

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems