Evaluation of Programs of Reeducation for Urinary Incontinence in Woman (ReedPerinee)

Hopital Foch

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence

Treatments

Other: Reference method

Other: CMP ® method

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02899520

2014/09

2014-A00709-38 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The objective of this study is to compare two methods of pelvic floor muscle training: reference method versus CMP ® method ( (Connaissance et Maîtrise de Périnée : Knowledge and Control of Perineum)

Enrollment

60 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patients more than 18 years old and less than 75 years
Patients presenting an urinary incontinence of effort or mixed symptomatic associated with a pelvic statics disorder
Patients with a perineale reeducation prescription
Patients affiliated to a national insurance scheme or benefiting from such a program
Patients having given her written consent form

Exclusion criteria

Nulliparous woman
Patients already operated for their incontinence
Patients with a prolapse of higher level at the stage II of the classification POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)
Pregnant women
Patients presenting an associated anal incontinence,
Patients presenting a cancellation (section of marrow, syringomyelia for example) or an inversion of perineum control
Patients having given birth less than 6 months before the care
Patients having benefited from a pelvi-périnéale reeducation in the previous 12 months,
Patients presenting psychiatric disease
Patients presenting a vaginismus,
Patients presenting a contraindication to the practice of the electrostimulation.