Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to evaluate the photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for the prevention of oral mucositis in osteosarcoma patients submitted to high doses of methotrexate, through two different protocols. As a hypothesis, photobiomodulation for the prevention of oral mucositis after cycles of Cisplatin, Doxorubicin and Methotrexate is more effective than just the application of preventive low-power laser after Methotrexate alone.
Full description
This is a phase 3, randomized study, with patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma, enrolled at national cancer institute in Brazil (INCA), candidates for the Glato protocol (chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate and surgery). Patients will be randomly randomized in permuted blocks to groups 1 or 2. After confirming the eligibility criteria, patients will be invited to participate in the research before starting treatment and the TCLE/TALE will be applied in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice Guide and national ethical standards.
After signing the TALE/TCLE, patients will be instructed to perform oral hygiene after all meals, solid or liquid, with fluoridated toothpaste. On the first day of chemotherapy, in addition to the oral hygiene protocol, patients will be instructed to rinse their mouth twice a day with 0.12% chlorhexidine for 7 days. Once hyposalivation is diagnosed, patients will use oral humidifying gel four times a day (brand provided by the institution).
Photobiomodulation therapy
Oral assessment
Patients will be evaluated at the beginning of chemotherapy treatment (D1) and in a second moment between the third and seventh subsequent days (D3 to D7). In weeks 24 and 28, the dental evaluation will be carried out on D1 and between the second and seventh day (D2 to D7). In the weeks when the patient does not attend the hospital, a teleconsultation will be carried out to monitor the symptoms and, if a need for face-to-face evaluation is identified, an appointment will be scheduled.The mucous membranes will be evaluated for color, hydration, integrity, presence of oral mucositis and fungal, bacterial and viral infections.
The assessment of oral mucositis will be established according to the 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the criteria established by Sonis et al in 1999 (OMAS). The WHO assessment scale is made up of: Grade 0 - no change (Absent); Grade 1 - presence of erythema; Grade 2 - presence of erythema and ulcers, but the patient is able to ingest solids and liquids; Grade 3 - presence of ulcers, but the patient can only ingest a liquid and pasty diet and Grade 4 - presence of ulcers and impossibility of ingesting solids or liquids.
The OMAS scale considers the presence and size of ulcerations/pseudomembranes and erythema. Ulcerations/pseudomembranes will be evaluated according to the following scores: 0 - in the absence of lesions, 1 - in lesions smaller than 1 cm3, 2 - in lesions measuring between 1 and 3 cm3 and 3 - in lesions larger than 3cm3. Erythema will be evaluated according to the following scores: 0 - when absent, 1 - when present but not severe and 2 - when present and severe. A daily calculation will be made of the sum of the weighted average of the ulcerated area and intensity of the erythema (MP=2.5 x [(∑ui : 3 x Nu )+ (∑ei: 2 x Ne) ], where ∑ ui= sum of ulcerated area, Nu= number of ulcerated areas, ∑ei= sum of erythema intensity and Ne= number of areas with erythema A millimeter dental ruler will be used to measure the area.
Patients will be asked about the presence or absence of oral and oropharyngeal pain. Both will be classified according to CTCAE v5.0 into grades 1, 2 and 3, associated with the Visual Analogue Scale, where the value 0 corresponds to no pain and 10, the greatest pain. According to the standards established by the visual analogue scale, values from 0 to 3 correspond to mild pain, from 4 to 6 to moderate pain and from 7 to 10 to severe pain.
The collection of adverse events will only be directed to events of interest to the study, related to toxicities in the oral cavity. It is not expected that there will be collection and analysis of serious adverse events in this study.
Xerostomia will be assessed according to the presence or absence of complaints about this condition on the part of the patient, associated with sialometry according to CTCAE v5.0 in grades 1, 2 and 3, on the first day of each chemotherapy cycle and between the third and seventh day (D3 and D7) of the same week of chemotherapy. In weeks 24 and 28, salivary flow will be assessed on the first day (D1) and between the second and seventh day (D2 to D7).
Unstimulated saliva collection will be performed according to the method described by Davies et al. (2002) The patient will remain seated vertically in a comfortable place. The first saliva sample will be discarded and the rest will be collected in a decontaminated bottle. The collected saliva will be converted into ml/minute and an unstimulated salivary flow of less than 0.1mL/min will be considered hyposalivation. Clinical criteria will also be used to identify xerostomia, such as sublingual salivary lake, salivary thickening and adherence of the wooden spatula to the oral mucosa, associated with the patient's complaint.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
53 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ana Maria D da Costa; Heliton S Antunes, Dr.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal