ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of Protective Pulmonary Ventilation by Pulmonary Ultrasound

G

General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Assessment

Treatments

Behavioral: recruitment maneuvers

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04991727
KYLL-2021-277

Details and patient eligibility

About

Peri - operative ultrasonography was used to evaluate the effects of protective lung ventilation on the postoperative lungs of obese patients.The purpose of this study was to apply ultrasound lung ventilation area score to the monitoring of pulmonary complications in patients with postoperative obesity.To verify the reliability and practicability of perioperative lung ultrasound quantitative scoring.

Full description

Ultrasound lung ventilation area score was applied to monitor the pulmonary complications of patients after obesity operation to verify the perioperative period.

The reliability and practicability of quantitative lung ultrasound score to clarify the effect of protective lung ventilation under perioperative pulmonary ultrasound monitoring on obesity patients.To guide the management of mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia and the prevention and treatment of postoperative pulmonary complications

Enrollment

100 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 100 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • enrollment of patients aged 18 years or above;
  • Eligible adult patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I to IV
  • undergoing elective or expedited nonurgent, noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • patient refusal;
  • morbid obesity (BMI >40 kg/ m²);
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status categories IV-V;
  • previous intrathoracic procedure;
  • severechronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s <30% of the predicted value;
  • a contraindication to radial artery cannulation.

Trial design

100 participants in 2 patient groups

PEEP
Description:
The patient was admitted to the operating room, and routine ECG monitoring was performed. The patient was placed in supine position, and ultrasound lung examination was performed. The images of the patient were saved and the score of lung ventilation area was recorded. The induction of general anesthesia was started, and endotracheal intubation was performed after 3min of preoxygenation (100% O2) to establish a safe and effective artificial airway.Mechanical ventilation was performed after endotracheal intubation, and a second time was performed immediately after endotracheal intubation was completed.Pulmonary ultrasound was performed. The PEEPgroup was given the first RM (pulmonary retraction) with pressure maintained at 40cmH2O for 30s, followed by a 7cmH2O PEEP to maintain mechanical ventilation, and the RMS was repeated every 30 minutes until the end of surgery
Treatment:
Behavioral: recruitment maneuvers
ZEEP
Description:
The patient was admitted to the operating room, and routine ECG monitoring was performed. The patient was placed in supine position, and ultrasound lung examination was performed. The images of the patient were saved and the score of lung ventilation area was recorded. The induction of general anesthesia was started, and endotracheal intubation was performed after 3min of preoxygenation (100% O2) to establish a safe and effective artificial airway. Mechanical ventilation was performed after endotracheal intubation, and a second time was performed immediately after endotracheal intubation was completed On pulmonary ultrasound, patients in the ZEEP group maintained normal mechanical ventilation throughout the operation without PEEP or RMS
Treatment:
Behavioral: recruitment maneuvers

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems