Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is being undertaken to collect data from Respironics Inc's BiPAP Auto Servo Ventilation 3 (autoSV3) and compare with data from Respironics, Inc's BiPAP autoSV2, to confirm that the algorithms in the BiPAP autoSV3 device can safely and effectively treat participants experiencing Complex Sleep Apneas (Comp SAS) no worse than its predecessor, the BiPAP auto Servo ventilation 2 (autoSV2) device. This will be determined using a comparative, randomized design with the participants blinded to the therapy. Additionally, attempts will be made to blind the central scorer(s) with respect to which device is in use.
Full description
This study was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic performance of a new auto Servo Ventilation device (Philips Respironics autoSV Advanced) for the treatment of complex central sleep apnea (CompSA). The features of autoSV Advanced include an automatic expiratory pressure (EPAP) adjustment, an advanced algorithm for distinguishing open versus obstructed airway apnea, a modified auto backup rate which is proportional to subject's baseline breathing rate, and a variable inspiratory support. Our primary aim was to compare the performance of the advanced servo-ventilator (BiPAP autoSV Advanced) with conventional servo-ventilator (BiPAP autoSV) in treating central sleep apnea (CSA).
Study Design: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Setting: Five sleep laboratories in the United States.
Participants: Thirty-seven participants were included.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Pre-Study Inclusion Criteria:
Enrollment Inclusion Criteria:
• Participants who, during the ambulatory polysomnography (PSG) study (Stardust), or in lab Diagnostic PSG demonstrated an Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥10 or Central Apnea Index (CAI) ≥5
or
• Participants who previously demonstrated Central sleep Apnea (CSA), with a CAI≥5 on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) titration.
Exclusion criteria
• Participants who are acutely ill, medically complicated or who are medically unstable.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
44 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal