ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Naso-alveolar Molding (NAM) Versus Computer Aided Design NAM (CAD/NAM) in Infants With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University (CU) logo

Cairo University (CU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cleft Lip and Palate

Treatments

Device: Computer aided design NAM (CAD/NAM)
Device: Naso-alveolar molding (NAM)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02881606
CEBD-CU-2016-08-184

Details and patient eligibility

About

Bilateral cleft lip and palate neonates will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (gp1 presurgical Naso-alveolar molding (NAM) using Grayson method, gp 2 computer aided design NAM (CAD/NAM). The aim of the study is to compare between short term clinical effects of both interventions as regards alveolar alignment, nasal esthetics and interlabial gap.

Enrollment

28 patients

Sex

All

Ages

7 to 60 days old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Bilateral cleft lip and palate

Exclusion criteria

Patients without cleft palate Unilateral cleft lip Patients having systemic medical problems that contraindicate NAM treatment Patients with history of previous presurgical infant orthopedics Patients with history of any surgical procedures (ex: lip adhesion)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

28 participants in 2 patient groups

Naso-alveolar molding (NAM)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Active plates and nasal stents (Grayson method)
Treatment:
Device: Naso-alveolar molding (NAM)
Computer aided design NAM (CAD/NAM)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Computer aided design active plates and nasal stents
Treatment:
Device: Computer aided design NAM (CAD/NAM)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems