Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Lipoprotein (Lp)(a) has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Niacin has been shown to lower Lp(a) in patients with normal or moderately elevated levels. However, there are few studies assessing the effectiveness of niacin in Lp(a) levels above 30 mg/dl. In addition, most studies investigating the effectiveness of niacin have only included small numbers of patients. Also, Lp(a) was only assessed as a secondary endpoint. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate whether Niacin is effective compared to placebo in the reduction of an elevated Lp(a).
Full description
The study is a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, parallel group, phase III, intervention study. Following randomisation at visit 1, subjects will receive 20 weeks of treatment with niacin or placebo.
The research question is: niacin therapy effective in lowering elevated Lipoprotein (Lp)(a) levels in comparison to placebo?
Sample size calculation is based on the t test of equal means with unequal group size (ratio: treatment group / control group = 2:1). The significance level is α=0.05 and the power 90%. Assuming a drop-out rate of 20%, sample size is 100 in the niacin group and 50 in the placebo group.
The active ingredient in the modified (prolonged, extended) release tablets is nicotinic acid, a B-complex vitamin. Modified release tablets containing 500 mg nicotinic acid, once daily for oral use, will be used.te of 20%, sample size is 100 in the niacin group and 50 in the placebo group.
Subjects will be recruited consecutively in the participating lipid clinics.
Subjects will be assessed at week -4 (run-in / wash-out), 0a+b (screening phase), 1, 5, 9, 13, and 20. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize continuous and categorical variables. Mean change of Lp(a) levels will be compared between treatment and placebo group. Subjects will be grouped according to treatment randomised (intention-to-treat, ITT population). For missing data, the last observation will be carried forward (LOCF). Comparisons between groups will be performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment as a factor, adjusting for baseline Lp(a) levels and other potential confounders.
Subgroup analyses will be performed according to Lp(a) phenotype, Lp(a) baseline level ( > 30-60 mg/dl, > 60 mg/dl), and concurrent statin therapy (yes / no).
Risks:
Flushing is the most common side effect of niacin. Other side effects include gastrointestinal disorders (common) (diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, or dyspepsia) and cardiac disorders (uncommon) (tachycardia, palpitations). A reversible elevation of liver enzymes has been reported, as well as a decreased glucose tolerance, reductions in platelet counts, increases in prothrombin time, elevations in uric acid levels, and reductions in phosphorous levels (uncommon or rarely). Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported very rarely.
Single reports on rhabdomyolysis in patients on combined therapy with niacin and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been reported. Careful monitoring for any signs and symptoms of myopathy such as muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness is therefore required in the case of combination therapy.
Benefit:
Niacin has been shown to improve the lipid profile in patients with reductions in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides and increases in HDL cholesterol. Niacin may also reduce elevated Lp(a) levels and may thus lower cardiovascular events in the long term.
The following variables will be assessed prior randomisation: socio-demographic factors, physical examinations, medical history, concurrent medication, health-related quality of life, costs prior study entry, and lipid as well as other laboratory parameters. Lipid parameters include Lp(a), total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides.
At follow-up, the respective laboratory analyses and physical examinations will be assessed at each visit. Subjects will be investigated with regard to safety and tolerability. Health-related quality of life and costs will be assessed at week 9 and 20.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal