Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Evaluates the effectiveness of on-label Paricalcitol versus Cinacalcet with Low-Dose Vitamin D.
Full description
During a 4-week washout period, participants stopped taking cinacalcet or other vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs). (Participants who were naive to cinacalcet or VDRAs did not have to wash out). At randomization, participants entered a 28-week open-label treatment period, during which they received either cinacalcet or paricalcitol. Participants who were assigned to receive paricalcitol were dosed according to the approved label in their respective geographic regions (i.e., IV at sites in the US and Russia and oral at sites in Europe). Supplemental cinacalcet was administered to participants in the paricalcitol arms who developed hypercalcemia (defined as >= 10.5 mg/dL). The evaluation period was from Weeks 21 to 28.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Male or female patients >= 18 years old.
Patient was diagnosed with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and had been receiving intravenous (IV) or oral vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) or cinacalcet during the 8 weeks prior to the screening period or naïve patients who had not received VDRA or cinacalcet within 8 weeks of screening.
Patient was on maintenance HD (hemodialysis) 3 times weekly (TIW) for at least 3 months prior to screening and was expected to remain on HD for the duration of the study.
For entry into the Pre-Treatment Washout Period (for patients who were not naïve to VDRAs and cinacalcet), the patient had to have screening laboratory values of:
Exclusion Criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
272 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal