ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of the Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Hemiplegia Rehabilitation

B

Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Upper Extremity Dysfunction
Hemiplegia

Treatments

Device: Group NMES
Other: Group Mirror+NMES
Other: Group Mirror

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04913506
BYIEAH-H

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate whether or not NMES in front of the mirror brings an additional benefit to mirror therapy alone or NMES alone on upper extremity motor and functional development, spasticity, anxiety, depression, cognitive function and activities of daily living, and neuropathic pain.

Full description

Cerebrovascular diseases are the general name given to clinical neurological pictures that occur as a result of pathological changes in the blood vessels of the primary lesion and / or in the properties of the blood passing through them. Many complications develop in the acute and chronic periods in patients with stroke, and the rate of complication development has been reported to vary between 40-96% in different studies. The aim of hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation is to prevent complications and improve lost motor-sensory control. Upper limb rehabilitation is less successful than lower limb rehabilitation because the upper limb is more functional and more complex.

For muscle reeducation, NMES is used to strengthen inhibited muscle groups, facilitate voluntary isolated muscle contraction, prevent muscle atrophy, increase metabolism and enzyme activity, change the contractile properties of the muscle, maintain or increase the normal range of motion of the joint, develop voluntary movement and functional gains. NMES has been used in hemiplegia rehabilitation since 1960 for the purpose of functional retraining of muscles. The purpose of this treatment is to enable the muscles with impaired neural function of the electrical current to perform a functional and useful movement.

Applications in front of the mirror are thought to trigger the neuronal connections in the motor cortex associated with the imagined movement. Findings obtained from studies with functional magnetic resonance support this theory. Compared to conventional PR, applications in front of the mirror are thought to have more and longer-lasting effects.

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Subacute hemiplegia
  • Patients who can communicate well, are motivated enough and are willing to participate in the study
  • Patients' medical conditions are stable
  • Initiation of voluntary extension movement in the wrist (lower limit)

Exclusion criteria

  • The presence of more than one previous cerebrovascular disease (except transient ischemic attack).
  • Presence of flaccid hemiplegia.
  • Presence of a previous neurological disease causing a decrease in strength in the affected extremity.
  • Presence of deformity due to a previous fracture, inflammatory arthropathy, etc. in the affected extremity.
  • Presence of more than grade 3 spasticity in upper extremity according to Modified Ashworth Scale
  • Use of cardiac pace maker
  • Presence of fatal cardiac arrhythmia
  • Presence of seizure history within 2 years.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

60 participants in 3 patient groups

Group Mirror
Active Comparator group
Description:
Along with conventional rehabilitation techniques, patients will be given ROM exercises in all directions, in front of the real mirror, by the practitioner on the healthy upper extremity for 30 minutes.
Treatment:
Other: Group Mirror
Group NMES
Active Comparator group
Description:
Along with conventional rehabilitation techniques, NMES will be applied to the hemiplegic arm for 30 minutes by the practitioner while the patients are sitting in a chair.
Treatment:
Device: Group NMES
Group Mirror+NMES
Active Comparator group
Description:
In addition to conventional rehabilitation techniques, patients will be given ROM exercises for 30 minutes in all directions in front of the real mirror to the healthy extremity, which the practitioner will synchronize with visual or auditory stimuli, and NMES treatment for 30 minutes to the paretic upper extremity.
Treatment:
Other: Group Mirror+NMES

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Burcu Metin Ökmen, M.D.Assoc. Prof

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems