Evaluation of the Efficacy of Descemet Membrane Transplantation for the Treatment of Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

Singapore National Eye Centre

Status and phase

Unknown

Early Phase 1

Conditions

Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

Treatments

Other: Descemet Membrane Transplantation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03275896

R1366/52/2016

Details and patient eligibility

About

Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) is a degenerative disease affecting the corneal endothelium. The current gold-standard for treatment of severe FED is endothelial keratoplasty, wherein a cadaveric Descemet's membrane / endothelium graft is transplanted. In this study, the investigators hypothesized that the transplantation of an acellular Descemet's membrane (i.e. Descemet Membrane Transplantation, 'DMT') may be equally efficacious in promoting recovery of endothelial function in this group of patients.

Full description

Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) is a degenerative disease affecting the corneal endothelium, characterized clinically by guttate excrescences on the posterior corneal surface and dysfunctional corneal endothelial cells. While patients are commonly asymptomatic in their early stages, advanced FED can be associated with significant corneal edema, scarring and impairment of visual function.

Patients with mild FED are usually managed conservatively with the application of topical hypertonic saline eyedrops. For patients with advanced FED, endothelial keratoplasty may often be necessary. In 2014, FED represented the most common indication for endothelial keratoplasty in the United States, accounting for 47.7% (13,817 cases) of all endothelial keratoplasty procedures performed nationwide. In Singapore, FED was the second most common indication for corneal transplantation.

Endothelial keratoplasty is associated with endothelial cell attrition in the range of 29.7% - 47% by the 3rd post-operative year. Additionally, the global demand for corneal graft material currently still far outstrips supply, critically limiting the number of patients who can potentially benefit from these surgical interventions. As such, there is a need explore alternative, sustainable strategies for the management of FED.

In 2009, Shah et al. reported the treatment of a 34 years old patient, with the combined pathologies of FED and Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy (PPMD), by primary stripping of the central 4-5mm of Descemet's membrane without corneal graft transplantation ('Primary Descemetorhexis'). Contrary to conventional expectations, there was complete repopulation of the posterior corneal surface by corneal endothelial cells following the surgery, with best-corrected-visual-acuity (BCVA) of 6/7.5 achieved by the 6th post-operative month. In 2014, Moloney et al. published a similar report of a 54 years old patient, diagnosed with FED, successfully treated by Primary Descemetorhexis. Rapid endothelial recovery, as evidenced by a central endothelial cell count of 620 cells/mm2 and BCVA of 6/6, was achieved by approximately 6 weeks after the surgery. The success of these cases raised the prospect of Primary Descemetorhexis as a feasible alternative for the treatment of FED.

To gain a better understanding of the factors which may affect endothelial recovery following Primary Descemetorhexis, investigators performed an ex vivo human corneal endothelial cell culture experiment in which Primary Descemetorhexis was performed on cadaveric human cornea buttons, followed by ex vivo culture for a duration of 2 weeks to allow for endothelial recovery. A less invasive approach of denuding endothelial cells from the Descemet's membrane (DM), while maintaining anatomical integrity of the DM, was also assessed. The investigators found that advanced patient age and the absence of DM were significantly associated with slower endothelial recovery.

As such, the investigators hypothesized that the outcomes of Primary Descemetorhexis for the treatment of FED may be improved by DM transplantation following Primary Descemetorhexis ('DM Transplantation'). The main difference between the proposed technique of DM transplantation and conventional endothelial keratoplasty is that the DM transplant does not require the presence of a functional corneal endothelial monolayer on the graft. If successful, the greatest advantage of this approach would be to greatly expand the pool of donors who are eligible to provide cadaveric corneal graft tissue for transplantation.

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

21 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy (FED) as defined by any of the following criteria:
1. FED of at least Grade 4 on the Krachmer grading scale (i.e. greater than 5mm of confluent central corneal guttata)
2. Best-corrected-visual-acuity of less than 6/12 in a patient clinically diagnosed with FED of any grade, in which poor visual acuity cannot be accounted by any other significant ophthalmic disease (e.g. cataracts, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, optic neuropathies)
Patients in the range of <85 years old will be recruited for this study
Only individuals with the mental capacity to provide informed consent will be included.
Patients who are willing and able to sign a written Informed Consent Form prior to any study-specific procedures will be included
Patients who are willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up examinations for up to 12 months after the surgery will be included

Exclusion criteria

Subjects that meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation:

Eyes which have previously been subject to any form of keratoplasty
An only-functioning eye in a patient who has lost visual potential in the contralateral eye
Patients with chronic, advanced FED who meet the above mentioned inclusion criteria, but whose disease is associated with significant stromal scarring to such an extent that will predictably impair post-operative visual recovery after DSAEK or DM transplant
Patients whose corneal endothelial disease may possibly be attributed to pathologies other than FED, including but not limited to pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, laser-peripheral-iridotomy induced bullous keratopathy, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome, Axenfeld Rieger syndrome, congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy and any other anterior segment developmental anomalies
Patients with visually significant cataracts
Patients with diagnosed with visually significant retinal disease, including but not limited to age-related macular degeneration, myopic macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, diabetes related maculopathy, retinal vein occlusion related maculpathy, retinal dystrophies and previous retinal detachments.
Patients with any form of glaucoma
Patients diagnosed with visually significant, non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies, including but not limited to those related to ischemic (both arteritic and non-arteritic), toxic, nutritional, myopic, compression, infective and inflammatory causes
Patients who are pregnant, lactating, of child-bearing potential and not practising a medically approved method of birth control, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial, and patients with other conditions associated with fluctuation of hormones that could lead to refractive changes.