Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of intermittent enteral nutrition versus continuous enteral nutrition to prevent from organ failures for patients at the acute phase of sepsis shock with mechanical ventilation in ICU.
Full description
Some pre-clinical and observational studies have suggested that intermittent fasting may have a positive impact on patients in ICU by increasing protein synthesis, sensibility to insulin, cetogenesis, autophagy by respecting the circadian rhythm. This study aims to evaluate the impact on organ failures of an intermittent enteral nutrition versus continuous enteral nutrition in patients at the acute phase of sepsis shock with mechanical ventilation in the ICU.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patient admitted in ICU for less than 48h, with invasive mechanical ventilation predicted for at least 48h, that can undergo nasogastric feeding for 7 days.
Patient under vasopressive drugs
Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years)
Informed person who has read and signed their consent
Affiliation to a social security scheme
No current pregnancy: for women of childbearing age, a beta-HCG blood pregnancy test will be performed upon inclusion; for postmenopausal women, a confirmatory diagnosis must be obtained.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
174 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Florian VALLIN; Fabienne TAMION, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal