Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The primary objective of this study is to compare the evolution of pain profiles among patients suffering from lateral epicondyalgia (tennis elbow) following three types of treatment: PRP-L injection versus type A botulinum toxin injection versus corticoid injection.
Full description
The secondary objectives are to compare the following among the three groups:
A- The global efficacy of each treatment defined by a minimum reduction of 25% in average pain over the last 24 hours between 0 and 6 months.
B- The evolution of average pain over the last 24 hours between 0 and each different time frame (3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months).
C- The evolution of maximum pain scores using nocturnal post-effort (Jamar grip test) visual analog scales (VAS) between day 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.
D- The perception of change on the Patient's Global Impression of Change score (PGIC) at 3 and 6 months E- The evolution of PRTEE scores at 0, 3 and 6 months F- Adverse events at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. G - Quality of life and utility via the SF-12 at 3 and 6 months. H- The consumption of analgesics.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
General inclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria for the target population: the patient has a side epicondylalgia objectified by:
General non-inclusion criteria:
Non-inclusion criteria for investigational and auxiliary medicinal products:
Non-inclusion criteria for the medical device used for the PRP samples (SmartPReP2 sampling system):
Non-inclusion criteria for interfering diseases or conditions:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
13 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal