Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This pilot observational study investigates the effects of standard toe separators on foot health in asymptomatic individuals. It aims to evaluate their impact on intermetatarsal spacing, plantar pressure distribution, digital circulation, and user comfort. Through pre- and post-intervention measurements using tools like thermography, gait analysis (Zebris), and the Foot Posture Index, the research seeks to determine whether these commonly used orthotic devices provide measurable benefits or pose risks. The study ultimately contributes to evidence-based podiatric care and public health education.
Full description
This research project titled "Evaluation of Toe Separators in Foot Health: A Pilot Observational Study (STEP-IN)" explores the biomechanical and physiological effects of standard, commercially available toe separators on healthy individuals without pre-existing podiatric conditions.
Given the growing popularity of these devices on social media and among the general public-often promoted as tools for correcting deformities, relieving plantar pain, or improving foot posture-this study aims to objectively assess their actual benefits and limitations using scientific methods.
The study employs a pre-post observational design involving 40 adult volunteers. A comprehensive analysis is conducted before and after the application of toe separators, focusing on several key variables:
Intermetatarsal angles and spacing measured through imaging (ultrasound or X-ray).
Gait and plantar pressure distribution assessed with the Zebris system.
Digital circulation evaluated visually and via thermographic imaging.
Foot posture assessed using the validated Foot Posture Index (FPI-6).
Comfort perception measured through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Participants are evaluated during static stance and dynamic walking conditions to determine how the devices affect natural biomechanics. Data is analyzed statistically using SPSS and JASP to compare pre- and post-intervention results, applying appropriate tests based on normality assumptions.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Católica de Valencia, and all participants provided informed consent.
This project aims not only to inform podiatric practice but also to serve as a foundation for future, larger-scale clinical trials. Additionally, it seeks to counteract misinformation by offering evidence-based insights into a widely used but poorly studied orthotic product.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
32 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal