ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of Treatments for Homeless Youths

The Ohio State University logo

The Ohio State University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 2

Conditions

Substance Abuse

Treatments

Behavioral: Case Management + HIV Prevention
Behavioral: Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) + HIV prevention
Behavioral: Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) + HIV prevention

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT01143792
R01DA013549 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
2005B0078

Details and patient eligibility

About

Youth who leave home for the streets are at significantly more risk for a multitude of problems, yet little research is available to guide treatment intervention efforts with this population. Studies document high rates of substance use, HIV risk, mental health problems, teenage pregnancy and criminality. Research to date examining homeless, street living youth has been primarily descriptive; less effort has been directed towards developing and evaluating treatment interventions for this group. The majority of homeless youth do not receive substance abuse treatment, with one study reporting that only 15% of street living youth report ever receiving mental health services. The effectiveness of the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) with street living youth was studied in our recently completed Stage 1 trial. The proposed study is a Stage II clinical trial examining outcome of CRA individual therapy as compared to two interventions commonly employed, yet little researched, with this group. All clients will be randomized to one of three theoretically distinct interventions: (1) CRA therapy, (2) Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET), or (3) Case Management (CM). The relative effectiveness of these interventions will be evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-baseline. The Social Ecology Theory of Development (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) guides our change hypotheses and intervention. Proposed change mechanisms (mediators) for each intervention will be evaluated. Differential treatment response as a function of ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation and abuse (moderators) will be investigated to better understand the interventions. The study will also examine how, if at all, treatment engagement, retention and expectations impact youth response to the three treatments. Information gained through this project may help address the gap in our understanding of how best to effectively intervene with a group at high risk for continuing health and psychological problems.

Enrollment

270 patients

Sex

All

Ages

14 to 20 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Youth are between the ages of 14-20.
  2. Youth have plans to remain in the Columbus areas for at least 12 months.
  3. Youth meets abuse or dependence DSM-IV criteria for Psychoactive Substance Use or Alcohol disorder, as assessed by the computerized diagnostic interview schedule for children (CDISC, Shaffer, 1992).
  4. Youth agrees to participate in the assessment and treatment intervention.
  5. Youth meets criteria for homelessness as defined by DHHS.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Evidence of unremitted psychosis or other condition which would impair their ability to understand and participate in the intervention or consent for research participation (as determined by CDISC).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

270 participants in 3 patient groups

CRA + HIV prevention
Experimental group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) + HIV prevention
Case Management + HIV prevention
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Case Management + HIV Prevention
MET + HIV prevention
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) + HIV prevention

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems