Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.
Synopsis of Study Design
The study consists of two phases:
Full description
The study is evaluating the efficacy of surgical treatment with PRK versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment. The primary analysis will be a treatment group comparison of the change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at the 8-month primary outcome visit. For participants wearing a contact lens, the BCVA will be the visual acuity tested in the contact lens rather than in spectacles (or trial frames).
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Age 3 to <8 years
Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:
Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:
Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):
Prior to enrollment into the Patching Run-In Phase, must have had patching and/or optical penalization with atropine or Bangerter filters prescribed for at least 6 months and optical correction of refractive error prescribed for at least 6 months. Prior treatment does not have to be continuous. Compliance with prescribed treatment does not influence eligibility but the best effort at compliance is expected from both the patient and provider.
Corneal thickness >500 microns (>510 microns within the previous 7 months, or corneal thickness between 500 and 510 microns within the last 2 months).
Central corneal thickness must be enough to allow the treatment dose needed while leaving a residual corneal thickness of ≥ 375 microns.
IOP ≤ 22 mm Hg within 7 months of enrollment
Investigator believes that the participant has achieved maximum improvement in amblyopic-eye VA with conventional treatment.
Investigator is willing to prescribe patching, and parent and child are willing to attempt patching for at least 8 weeks for 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) in the Patching Run-In Phase.
No rigid gas permeable lens (including OrthoK) worn in the past 2 months
Soft contact lens is currently worn, has been attempted within the past 4 months, or a contact lens fitting exam (paid for by the study) is scheduled or the investigator does the contact lens fitting on the same day as enrollment.
Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization (if child meets eligibility criteria after Patching Run-In Phase).
Parent has a phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff during the next 36 months.
Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study without the next 36 months is not anticipated.
Exclusion criteria
Non-refractive ocular cause for reduced VA in the amblyopic eye (example: cataract, posterior staphyloma, extensive myelinated nerve fiber layer, optic nerve anomaly, macular scar, corneal opacity); or any cause of previous form deprivation.
Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:
History of retinopathy of prematurity resulting in macular ectopia
Down syndrome (trisomy 21)
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
0 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal