Experiential Learning vs Traditional Ergonomic Training in Logistics Workers

Okan University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders; Posture; Occupational Health

Treatments: Behavioral: Traditional Ergonomic Seminar Education; Behavioral: Experiential Learning-Based Ergonomic Training Program

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07745400

HACETTEPE-GO-15/29-31

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background:

Musculoskeletal disorders are common occupational health problems among industrial workers, particularly manual material handlers involved in repetitive lifting and physical tasks. Ergonomic education and postural awareness interventions are frequently used to prevent these disorders, but long-term follow-up data regarding their effectiveness remain limited.

Purpose:

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the 12-month effectiveness of an intensive ergonomic education and postural awareness program on musculoskeletal symptoms, ergonomic risk levels, handling posture, and knowledge levels among manual material handlers.

Methods:

In this randomized controlled trial, participants were randomly allocated into two groups: an Intervention Group and a Control Group. The Intervention Group received comprehensive theoretical and practical ergonomic education focused on safe material handling and postural awareness, followed by regular follow-ups and reminders. The Control Group received baseline assessments without ongoing postural reinforcement. Outcome measures-including musculoskeletal symptom severity, ergonomic posture risk, and ergonomic knowledge-were evaluated at baseline, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months.

Full description

Study Design and Setting:

This study was conducted as a single-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of an ergonomic education and postural awareness intervention program among manual material handlers. Assessments and follow-up protocols were carried out over a 12-month period.

Participant Allocation:

Eligible industrial workers were randomly assigned into two groups: the Intervention Group and the Control Group. Randomization was performed to ensure balanced distribution between groups.

Intervention Group Protocol:

Participants in the Intervention Group underwent a multi-faceted ergonomic education program comprising:

Comprehensive theoretical and practical ergonomic education covering body mechanics, safe manual material handling, and postural awareness.

On-site feedback and workstation evaluations tailored to baseline ergonomic posture risk assessments.

Periodic follow-ups and educational reminders throughout the 12-month study period to maintain compliance, exercise habits, and behavioral reinforcement.

Control Group Protocol:

Participants in the Control Group received standard baseline ergonomic evaluations and basic informational materials regarding ergonomics without ongoing post-assessment reminders or guided postural feedback.

Follow-up Timeline:

Both groups were prospectively evaluated at five specific time points: Baseline (0 months), 3rd month, 6th month, 9th month, and 12th month. Outcome parameters included ergonomic posture risk levels, musculoskeletal symptoms, ergonomic knowledge, and long-term adherence.

Enrollment: 70 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 65 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Having performed manual material handling tasks for at least the last 12 months.
• Having worked at least 30 hours per week in tasks requiring the use of upper extremities and hands.
• Voluntarily participating in the study and signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

• Having received training in musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) or ergonomics within the last 6 months.
• Having received medical treatment for MSDs within the last 6 months.
• Using medications that may affect muscle tone or balance.
• Having a congenital or acquired physical disability that causes functional limitation.
• Having a Body Mass Index less than 20 kg/m² or greater than 35 kg/m².
• Having joint restriction in the extremities or spine.
• Having a neurological or rheumatic disease.
• Having a score of 30 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

70 participants in 3 patient groups

Experiential Learning Group (ELG)

Experimental group

Description:

Participants (n=22) in this arm received an interactive, 8-hour ergonomic education program based on Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, specifically designed to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders and mitigate ergonomic risks. The training incorporated situation-based scenarios, role-playing, peer-interactive games, and practical motor-skill training for a 10-exercise home exercise program. Outcome assessments were conducted over a 12-month period (Baseline, Post-intervention, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months).

Treatment:

Behavioral: Experiential Learning-Based Ergonomic Training Program

Seminar Group (SG)

Active Comparator group

Description:

Participants (n=22) in this arm received a standard 6-hour classroom-based traditional ergonomic seminar education. The session covered the exact same core ergonomic curriculum and home exercise program as the ELG, delivered through didactic lectures, slide presentations, and question-and-answer sessions without interactive practical group exercises. Outcome assessments were conducted over a 12-month period (Baseline, Post-intervention, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months).

Treatment:

Behavioral: Traditional Ergonomic Seminar Education

Control Group (CG)

No Intervention group

Description:

Participants (n=26) in this arm received no educational or practical intervention during the 12-month study period and maintained their routine work activities. Outcome assessments were conducted prospectively at the exact same follow-up time points as the intervention groups (Baseline, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months).