ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Exploring the Role of Working Memory Saturation in Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Using the Eye Blink Conditioning Paradigm

H

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing

Treatments

Behavioral: eye movement
Behavioral: TMT-B
Behavioral: TMT-A

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06878807
HCB/2021/0283

Details and patient eligibility

About

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is a well-established, evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is endorsed by leading organizations such as the American Psychiatric Association and the World Health Organization. During EMDR therapy, patients focus on recalling traumatic events while simultaneously engaging with an external stimulus. Specifically, patients undergo lateral eye movements. This process is believed to reduce the vividness and emotional intensity of traumatic memories by addressing and desensitizing their cognitive, emotional, and physical components. Despite its proven efficacy in treating PTSD, the precise mechanisms underlying these therapeutic effects remain not fully understood.

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the efficacy of EMDR. Among them, the working memory hypothesis is particularly influential and is supported by a substantial body of research. This hypothesis suggests that aversive memories and fear, when recalled, occupy limited memory resources. Therefore, performing a task, such as eye movements, during the recall of the traumatic experience would result in a competition for limited memory resources, leading to a decrease in the vividness and emotional intensity of the traumatic memory. Consequently, the dual task inherent in EMDR is thought to facilitate a rapid elimination of the emotional responses triggered by the traumatic memory, allowing patients to alleviate the physical and psychological distress associated with the trauma.

Measuring the effects of an EM intervention through a standardized protocol could clarify the conditions under which the intervention is most effective and elucidate the potential mechanisms of EMDR. In this context, the Eye Blink Conditioning (EBC) task, a well-established and standardized conditioning paradigm, seems relevant for testing the working memory hypothesis.

In the EBC task, eyelid closure is measured in response to a corneal air puff, which acts as the unconditioned stimulus. The unconditioned stimulus is paired with a neutral stimulus, a tone, which becomes a conditioned stimulus by eliciting a conditioned response similar to that produced by the unconditioned stimulus. After the conditioning phase, participants undergo the extinction phase. In this phase, the conditioned stimulus is presented without the unconditioned stimulus for many trials, and the main objective is to measure how many trials it takes for the participants to eliminate the previous associative learning between the aversive stimulus (air puff) and the conditioned stimulus (tone).

This study aimed to explore whether the effectiveness of a straightforward eye movement intervention in accelerating extinction is influenced by the working memory hypothesis. The hypothesis is that the enhancement of extinction learning is dependent on working memory saturation. Understanding the role of working memory saturation in the effectiveness of eye movements during extinction learning could provide critical insights into the working memory hypothesis as a potential key mechanism underlying the efficacy of EMDR therapy.

Enrollment

112 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior exposure to EMDR therapy or eye movement (EM) experiments
  • Positive diagnosis of PTSD or other Axis I disorders as determined by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • Hearing or visual impairments

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

112 participants in 4 patient groups, including a placebo group

Eye Movement Intervention
Experimental group
Description:
Participants underwent EM tasks during the first 30 seconds of the extinction phase. All participants in this group experienced identical EM conditions in terms of speed and duration
Treatment:
Behavioral: eye movement
TMT-B
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants performed the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B).
Treatment:
Behavioral: TMT-B
TMT-A
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Participants performed the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A).
Treatment:
Behavioral: TMT-A
Control group
No Intervention group
Description:
Participants engaged in no additional task. These subjects were told to focus their gaze on a wall in front of them.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems