Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This is a study that compares two types of surgery for rectal cancer. There are two procedures that can be used during this surgery, conventional abdominal resection (APR) and extended (or extralevator) APR. The investigators are doing this research to see whether the extralevator APR increases the likelihood that the edge of the tissue that is removed will be more likely to be free from cancer cells compared with the conventional APR surgery. At this time there is no evidence that one type of procedure is better at this than the other. The objective of this research is to determine whether extralevator APR is more likely to have clean margins (free of cancer) compared to the standard APR surgery.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
with pelvic side wall involvement requiring sacrectomy requiring prostatectomy (partial or total) Distant metastasis (M1) Unresectable primary rectal cancer or Inability to complete R0 resection. Recurrent rectal cancer Previous pelvic malignancy Inability to sign informed consent Pregnancy
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
34 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Eileen Finnin, RN; Roberto Bergamaschi, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal