Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Consumption of out-of-home (OOH) food is associated with significantly greater energy and less-healthy nutrient (i.e. fats, salt and sugar) intake. The price of food is a key consideration of food choice, particularly for individuals of lower socioeconomic position (SEP). Little research to date has examined the causal effect of removing price-based incentives on purchasing behaviour in OOH food settings. One online randomised controlled trial explored the effect of removing three types of price-based incentives individually and in combination, on food choice through a virtual food delivery platform. This study found that energy selection was 7-8% lower when price incentives were removed. While not statistically significant, Bayes factors indicted that data comparing control vs "all promotions removed" conditions were inconclusive (BF10 = 0.55) and therefore could not provide support for the alternative or null hypotheses. A limitation of this study is that the outcome was hypothetical food choice. As participants would not pay for or receive their selected meals, the prices of foods may have been less salient, thus reducing the potential for impact. In the present study, exploring real-world consumer behaviour (as opposed to hypothetical choice) will better determine the potential impact of removing price-based incentives in the OOH food sector.
Full description
See attached study protocol for detailed information
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Able to order and pay for a takeaway pizza for delivery today or tomorrow
Currently reside in select postcode areas
Over the age of 18 years
Report having used food delivery services in the last year
Exclusion criteria
Partaking in a fast or other restrictive eating (e.g. for religious or health reasons) at time of participation
A previous eating disorder diagnosis
Currently on appetite-suppressing medication
Dietary restrictions/intolerances including:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
600 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Amy Finlay; Eric Robinson
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal