ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Feasibility and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on Length of Stay Among Laparotomy Patients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (ERAS-Lap)

M

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Status

Completed

Conditions

Laparotomy

Treatments

Dietary Supplement: Carbohydrate drink load
Combination Product: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03665376
MUST16/2017

Details and patient eligibility

About

The main goal of ERAS is to enhance the recovery of patients, and this has secondary effects, such reduced length of hospital stay, minimal postoperative complications and lessen readmission rates. ERAS protocols have been shown to be feasible and safe across the world. Although it has been shown to be effective in the developed settings and can potentially reduce the length of hospital stay, and the cost of healthcare in the perioperative period. The multimodal program of ERAS has been less implemented in the low and middle income African countries. Studies done outside Uganda (Egypt and South Africa) have demonstrated that ERAS program can be feasible and yields favorable outcomes in patients.

Full description

The efficacy of ERAS has been demonstrated in resource rich settings but limited evidence is available from resource poor settings. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and test efficacy of ERAS in reducing length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications compared to the standard of care as the control group.

33 participants above 18 years of age, undergoing laparotomy, were randomly assigned to an intervention (ERAS) arm or to a control (standard surgical care) arm at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda. The ERAS and the control arm had 16 and 17 patients respectively, followed-up 14 days after surgery.

Patients in the ERAS arm had 2.4 days (SD 0.7) of post-operative hospital stay shorter than those in the control arm, p=0.0025 (4.1±0.2 vs 6.5±0.6 respectively). 18.8% of patients in the control arm developed post-operative complications compared to 5.9% in the ERAS arm (Statistical insignificance, p=0.34). ERAS patients passed flatus eight hours earlier than patients in the control arm, and mobilisation out of bed happened 12 hours earlier in the ERAS group p value=0.4.

ERAS is feasible at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, and it leads to reduced hospital stay duration but not post-operative complications in laparotomy cases.

Enrollment

33 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • We enrolled adult patients, 18 years of age and above, scheduled for non-emergency laparotomy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with age less than 18 years
  • Pregnant patients
  • Emergency Laparotomy
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score greater than 3
  • Surgeries other than elective gastrointestinal laparotomy
  • Diabetes patients

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

33 participants in 2 patient groups

ERAS arm
Experimental group
Description:
Preoperative: Counseling and education about the ERAS program; Oral intake until 6 hours before the surgery; Carbohydrate drinks load; No mechanical bowel preparation; Antithrombotic prophylaxis (Tinzaparin 3500 IU) Intraoperative: Spinal anaesthesia (15 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine + 200mcg intrathecal Morphine); Intravenous Ceftriaxone 2g, Metronidazole 500mg / Gentamycin 160mg, Ondansetron 8mg and Dexamethasone 8mg; Crystalloid fluid 10 to 20ml/Kg; Adrenaline 200mcg in each 500 ml of intravenous fluid; Avoidance of abdominal drains; Postoperative: Early oral intake; Nasogastric tube and urinary catheter removed immediately after the surgery; Early enteral nutrition; Chewing gum for 2 to 4 hours after surgery; Oral sips 8 hours postoperatively; Intravenous fluids discontinued at four hours after transfer to the ward.
Treatment:
Combination Product: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Dietary Supplement: Carbohydrate drink load
Control arm
No Intervention group
Description:
Preoperative: No carbohydrate drink loads, no antithrombotic prophylaxis; Mechanical bowel preparation as needed; Spinal anaesthesia, fluid therapy and antibiotherapy done according to standard hospital practice. The urinary catheter and drains were removed at the discretion of the surgeon. Postoperative: Enteral feeding delayed by the auscultation of bowel sounds. The standard hospital practices involve keeping active the nasogastric tube, fasting patients postoperative, strict bed rest... Pain control was managed with medication of choice by surgeon and anesthesiologist.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems